FMET ranks 2nd and NXTG 3rd of 6 funds in the Metaverse & Connectivity Category.
FMET vs NXTG
FMET −0.31pt a year
0.39%0.70%
NXTG 2.0×the volume
4.07K8.33K
NXTG +15.8pt
+16.7%+32.5%
FMET vs NXTG Performance
−3.7%+34.2%
- FMET 0.39%, better
- NXTG 0.70%
- FMET $43M
- NXTG $532M
- FMET −3.7%
- NXTG +34.2%, better
- FMET 0.74%
- NXTG 1.36%, better
- FMET 62
- NXTG 107
- FMET 4.07K sh
- NXTG 8.33K sh, better
- FMET $36.72
- NXTG $145.63
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMET | NXTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81Higher | F21 |
| Mission | A80Higher | A77 |
| Risk | D38 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | B66Higher |
| Holdings | B64 | A79Higher |
| Durability | C48 | A82Higher |
Rank among Metaverse & Connectivity funds
Same Category. FMET and NXTG are both graded against the same 6 Metaverse & Connectivity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMETB
NXTGC
In short
FMET Fidelity's in-house take on the metaverse trade: a passive, global basket of roughly 60 companies building the plumbing, priced well under the typical thematic fund. A big-brand ETF in a corner usually run by boutiques.
NXTG A 5G fund that isn't a 5G-boom baby. NXTG has been running since 2011 and spreads the connectivity theme across roughly 100 stocks worldwide. Long tenure and broad reach, at a premium price tag.
Stated mandate
FMET The fund seeks investment returns that generally track the Fidelity Metaverse Index before fees and expenses.
NXTG The Fund seeks returns corresponding generally to the Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index and normally invests at least 90% of net assets in securities comprising that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMET vs NXTG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMET vs NXTG Cost
Overpaying NXTG vs FMET
$5,708
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMET 0.39%
$7,898
NXTG 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMET | NXTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,250 | $545 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,760 | $2,035 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $13,606 | $5,708 |
- 0.39%FMET, cheaper
- 0.70%NXTG
- Middle half of Metaverse & Connectivity funds
- Median 0.64%
FMET cheapest of 6 funds
NXTG 5th cheapest of 6 funds
FMET vs NXTG Dividends
- FMET 0.74%
- NXTG 1.36%, better
- FMET $0.27
- NXTG $1.98
- FMET $0.11
- NXTG $0.63
- FMET Sep 18, 2026
- NXTG Sep 24, 2026
- FMET Sep 22, 2026
- NXTG Sep 30, 2026
- FMET Quarterly
- NXTG Quarterly
Distribution history
FMET vs NXTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMET 20.0%, betterNXTG 20.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FMET 0.65NXTG 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- FMET −29.2%NXTG −33.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FMET 1.46NXTG 1.34
FMET and NXTG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
