FMET ranks 2nd and SNSR 5th of 6 funds in the Metaverse & Connectivity Category.
FMET vs SNSR
FMET −0.29pt a year
0.39%0.68%
SNSR 3.9×the volume
4.07K15.9K
SNSR +2.1pt
+16.7%+18.8%
FMET vs SNSR Performance
−3.7%+21.2%
- FMET 0.39%, better
- SNSR 0.68%
- FMET $43M
- SNSR $196M
- FMET −3.7%
- SNSR +21.2%, better
- FMET 0.74%, better
- SNSR 0.49%
- FMET 62
- SNSR 72
- FMET 4.07K sh
- SNSR 15.9K sh, better
- FMET $36.72
- SNSR $46.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMET | SNSR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81Higher | C40 |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | D38Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | C45 | B56Higher |
| Holdings | B64Higher | C52 |
| Durability | C48 | B69Higher |
Rank among Metaverse & Connectivity funds
Same Category. FMET and SNSR are both graded against the same 6 Metaverse & Connectivity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMETB
SNSRC
In short
FMET Fidelity's in-house take on the metaverse trade: a passive, global basket of roughly 60 companies building the plumbing, priced well under the typical thematic fund. A big-brand ETF in a corner usually run by boutiques.
SNSR The ticker is the thesis: sensors. SNSR has tracked a single Internet of Things index since 2016, buying the roughly 70 developed-market names that build the chips, sensors and connected hardware behind smart everything.
Stated mandate
FMET The fund seeks investment returns that generally track the Fidelity Metaverse Index before fees and expenses.
SNSR The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index. It invests at least 80% of assets in securities represented by that index and targets companies facilitating the Internet of Things.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMET vs SNSR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMET vs SNSR Cost
Overpaying SNSR vs FMET
$5,354
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMET 0.39%
$7,898
SNSR 0.68%
$13,252
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMET | SNSR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,215 | $510 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,633 | $1,908 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $13,252 | $5,354 |
- 0.39%FMET, cheaper
- 0.68%SNSR
- Middle half of Metaverse & Connectivity funds
- Median 0.64%
FMET cheapest of 6 funds
SNSR 4th cheapest of 6 funds
FMET vs SNSR Dividends
- FMET 0.74%, better
- SNSR 0.49%
- FMET $0.27
- SNSR $0.23
- FMET $0.11
- SNSR $0.08
- FMET Sep 18, 2026
- SNSR Jun 29, 2026
- FMET Sep 22, 2026
- SNSR Jul 7, 2026
- FMET Quarterly
- SNSR Twice a year
Distribution history
FMET vs SNSR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMET 20.0%, betterSNSR 22.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- FMET 0.65SNSR 0.68, better
- Worst fall
- FMET −29.2%SNSR −38.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FMET 1.46SNSR 1.68
FMET and SNSR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
