FMET ranks 2nd and METV 4th of 6 funds in the Metaverse & Connectivity Category.
FMET vs METV
FMET −0.20pt a year
0.39%0.59%
METV 12.0×the volume
4.07K48.8K
METV +11.8pt
+16.7%+28.5%
FMET vs METV Performance
−3.7%−4.5%
- FMET 0.39%, better
- METV 0.59%
- FMET $43M
- METV $209M
- FMET −3.7%, better
- METV −4.5%
- FMET 0.74%, better
- METV 0.17%
- FMET 62
- METV 31
- FMET 4.07K sh
- METV 48.8K sh, better
- FMET $36.72
- METV $19.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMET | METV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81Higher | B57 |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | D38Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | C45 | C53Higher |
| Holdings | B64Higher | D37 |
| Durability | C48 | B58Higher |
Rank among Metaverse & Connectivity funds
Same Category. FMET and METV are both graded against the same 6 Metaverse & Connectivity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMETB
METVC
In short
FMET Fidelity's in-house take on the metaverse trade: a passive, global basket of roughly 60 companies building the plumbing, priced well under the typical thematic fund. A big-brand ETF in a corner usually run by boutiques.
METV Launched in 2021 with an index built by Matthew Ball's research group, METV is the metaverse theme in its original form: roughly 50 globally listed companies spanning chips, networks, virtual worlds and payments.
Stated mandate
FMET The fund seeks investment returns that generally track the Fidelity Metaverse Index before fees and expenses.
METV The fund seeks to track the Ball Metaverse Index before fees and expenses by investing primarily in globally listed companies whose activities, products, services, or technologies enable the Metaverse.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMET vs METV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMET vs METV Cost
Overpaying METV vs FMET
$3,737
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMET 0.39%
$7,898
METV 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMET | METV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,058 | $353 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,051 | $1,326 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $11,635 | $3,737 |
- 0.39%FMET, cheaper
- 0.59%METV
- Middle half of Metaverse & Connectivity funds
- Median 0.64%
FMET cheapest of 6 funds
METV 3rd cheapest of 6 funds
FMET vs METV Dividends
- FMET 0.74%, better
- METV 0.17%
- FMET $0.27
- METV $0.03
- FMET $0.11
- METV $0.03
- FMET Sep 18, 2026
- METV Dec 30, 2025
- FMET Sep 22, 2026
- METV Dec 31, 2025
- FMET Quarterly
- METV Irregular
Distribution history
FMET vs METV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMET 20.0%, betterMETV 21.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FMET 0.65METV 1.06, better
- Worst fall
- FMET −29.2%METV −59.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FMET 1.46METV 1.39
FMET and METV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

