IEFA ranks 4th and FNDF 14th of 20 funds in the Developed International Core Category.
FNDF vs IEFA
IEFA −0.18pt a year
0.25%0.07%
IEFA 5.4×the volume
1.65M8.85M
FNDF +2.2pt
+11.4%+9.2%
FNDF vs IEFA Performance
+90.4%+48.4%
- FNDF 0.25%
- IEFA 0.07%, better
- FNDF $25.8B
- IEFA $189B
- FNDF +26.7%, better
- IEFA +13.3%
- FNDF 3.04%
- IEFA 3.41%, better
- FNDF 901
- IEFA 2638
- FNDF 1.65M sh
- IEFA 8.85M sh, better
- FNDF $53.98
- IEFA $96.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FNDF | IEFA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | B68Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B64Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | C47 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | A87Higher |
| Durability | B68 | A85Higher |
Rank among Developed International Core funds
Same Category. FNDF and IEFA are both graded against the same 20 Developed International Core funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FNDFB
IEFAA
In short
FNDF Most developed-international index funds rank companies by market price. FNDF ranks them by fundamental business size and rebalances back to it, a contrarian, value-leaning route through roughly 900 of the same stocks.
IEFA Developed markets outside the US and Canada, right down to the small caps: roughly 2,600 stocks for 0.07% a year. The category's workhorse, and one of the biggest, most heavily traded funds on the shelf.
Stated mandate
FNDF The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index representing large companies from developed markets outside the United States, weighted according to fundamental size.
IEFA The fund seeks to track an index of large-, mid- and small-capitalization developed-market equities outside the United States and Canada.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FNDF vs IEFA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FNDF vs IEFA Cost
Overpaying FNDF vs IEFA
$3,679
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FNDF 0.25%
$5,159
IEFA 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FNDF | IEFA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $128 | $327 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $503 | $1,266 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $1,480 | $3,679 |
- 0.25%FNDF
- 0.07%IEFA, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed International Core funds
- Median 0.10%
IEFA 7th cheapest of 20 funds
FNDF 15th cheapest of 20 funds
FNDF vs IEFA Dividends
- FNDF 3.04%
- IEFA 3.41%, better
- FNDF $1.64
- IEFA $3.29
- FNDF $0.30
- IEFA $1.58
- FNDF Jun 24, 2026
- IEFA Jun 15, 2026
- FNDF Jun 29, 2026
- IEFA Jun 18, 2026
- FNDF Twice a year
- IEFA Twice a year
Distribution history
FNDF vs IEFA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FNDF
- IEFA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FNDF 12.4%IEFA 11.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FNDF 1.50, betterIEFA 1.20
- Worst fall
- FNDF −25.6%, betterIEFA −30.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FNDF 0.97IEFA 0.89
FNDF and IEFA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



