QLD ranks 1st and FNGG 34th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
FNGG vs QLD
QLD −0.08pt a year
0.97%0.89%
QLD 1001.4×the volume
4.14K4.15M
QLD +16.0pt
−1.4%+14.6%
FNGG vs QLD Performance
−7.0%+97.9%
- FNGG 0.97%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- FNGG $106M
- QLD $13.3B
- FNGG −2.9%
- QLD +10.7%, better
- FNGG 10.72%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- FNGG 18
- QLD 113
- FNGG 4.14K sh
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- FNGG $245.50
- QLD $82.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FNGG | QLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | A72Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | C52 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | B65 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. FNGG and QLD are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FNGGC
QLDA
In short
FNGG Two-times daily exposure to the NYSE FANG+ Index in one ticker, priced under the typical leveraged fund. Like every daily-reset product, the math is built around a single trading day at a time.
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
Stated mandate
FNGG The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the NYSE FANG+ Index for a single day.
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FNGG vs QLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FNGG vs QLD Cost
Overpaying FNGG vs QLD
$1,326
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FNGG 0.97%
$18,198
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FNGG | QLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,576 | $136 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $5,953 | $490 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $16,872 | $1,326 |
- 0.97%FNGG
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
FNGG 68th cheapest of 95 funds
FNGG vs QLD Dividends
- FNGG 10.72%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- FNGG $24.73
- QLD $0.12
- FNGG $0.66
- QLD $0.03
- FNGG Sep 22, 2026
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- FNGG Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- FNGG Quarterly
- QLD Quarterly
Distribution history
FNGG vs QLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FNGG
- QLD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FNGG 46.8%QLD 36.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FNGG 1.14, betterQLD 1.04
- Worst fall
- FNGG −91.3%QLD −63.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FNGG 2.81QLD 2.46
FNGG and QLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
