WQTM ranks 2nd and FOTO 7th of 8 funds in the Quantum Computing & Photonics Category.
FOTO vs WQTM
WQTM −0.30pt a year
0.75%0.45%
FOTO 1.6×the volume
329K203K
FOTO vs WQTM Performance
−39.2%−25.0%
- FOTO 0.75%
- WQTM 0.45%, better
- FOTO $71M
- WQTM $288M
- FOTO
- WQTM −9.1%
- FOTO 28
- WQTM 57
- FOTO 329K sh, better
- WQTM 203K sh
- FOTO $11.51
- WQTM $26.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FOTO | WQTM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F22 | A72Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D28 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | A73Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | D36 | A89Higher |
| Durability | C53 | A91Higher |
Rank among Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
Same Category. FOTO and WQTM are both graded against the same 8 Quantum Computing & Photonics funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FOTOD
WQTMA
In short
FOTO Photonics with a purity test: holdings must earn at least half their revenue from the business of moving data as light instead of electricity. About 40 global names, actively managed, and per its prospectus income comes first, generated with a systematic put spread strategy.
WQTM Plenty of quantum ETFs treat a chip giant and a qubit startup as near-equals. WQTM, built with quantum software firm Classiq, scores how central quantum actually is to each company and pushes weight toward the pure plays.
Stated mandate
FOTO The Fund seeks current income and, secondarily, long-term capital appreciation. It targets photonics-related companies and uses a systematic put spread strategy to generate income.
WQTM The Fund passively tracks the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FOTO vs WQTM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FOTO vs WQTM Cost
Overpaying FOTO vs WQTM
$5,441
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FOTO 0.75%
$14,482
WQTM 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FOTO | WQTM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $812 | $524 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $3,128 | $1,950 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $9,041 | $5,441 |
- 0.75%FOTO
- 0.45%WQTM, cheaper
- Middle half of Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
- Median 0.54%
WQTM 3rd cheapest of 8 funds
FOTO 7th cheapest of 8 funds
FOTO vs WQTM Dividends
- FOTO None
- WQTM None
Distribution history
FOTO vs WQTM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FOTO WQTM 50.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FOTO WQTM −0.13
- Worst fall
- FOTO WQTM −42.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FOTO 1.72WQTM 3.08
FOTO and WQTM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




