CQTM ranks 3rd and FOTO 7th of 8 funds in the Quantum Computing & Photonics Category.
CQTM vs FOTO
0.0%by weight
CQTM −0.40pt a year
0.35%0.75%
FOTO 15.6×the volume
21.1K329K
CQTM vs FOTO Performance
−29.4%−39.2%
- CQTM 0.35%, better
- FOTO 0.75%
- CQTM $15M
- FOTO $71M
- CQTM 20
- FOTO 28
- CQTM 21.1K sh
- FOTO 329K sh, better
- CQTM $17.56
- FOTO $11.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CQTM | FOTO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | F22 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C51Higher | D28 |
| Tradability | C50 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | C49Higher | D36 |
| Durability | B55Higher | C53 |
Rank among Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
Same Category. CQTM and FOTO are both graded against the same 8 Quantum Computing & Photonics funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CQTMB
FOTOD
In short
CQTM An active take on the quantum race that plays both sides: the companies building the machines and the ones building security meant to survive them. Fee is 0.35% a year, under the typical global thematic fund.
FOTO Photonics with a purity test: holdings must earn at least half their revenue from the business of moving data as light instead of electricity. About 40 global names, actively managed, and per its prospectus income comes first, generated with a systematic put spread strategy.
Stated mandate
CQTM The Fund's stated aim is to increase the value of shareholders' investments.
FOTO The Fund seeks current income and, secondarily, long-term capital appreciation. It targets photonics-related companies and uses a systematic put spread strategy to generate income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CQTM vs FOTO Holdings
How CQTM and FOTO differ
0.0%
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Country74.0%
- Sector89.1%
Sector
| Sector | More in CQTMMore in FOTO | Gap | CQTM | FOTO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | FOTO +9.3 points | 89.1% | 98.4% | |
| Industrials | CQTM +5.5 points | 5.5% | 0.0% | |
| Communication | CQTM +5.3 points | 5.3% | 0.0% | |
| Materials | FOTO +1.6 points | 0.0% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CQTMMore in FOTO | Gap | CQTM | FOTO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FOTO +24.2 points | 72.7% | 96.9% | |
| Canada | CQTM +7.4 points | 8.7% | 1.3% | |
| Singapore | CQTM +5.4 points | 5.4% | 0.0% | |
| Finland | CQTM +4.6 points | 4.6% | 0.0% | |
| United Kingdom | CQTM +4.0 points | 4.0% | 0.0% | |
| Switzerland | CQTM +2.7 points | 2.7% | 0.0% | |
| France | CQTM +1.8 points | 1.8% | 0.0% | |
| Sweden | FOTO +1.8 points | 0.0% | 1.8% |
Concentration
- CQTM74.0%
- FOTO181.0%
- CQTM19
- FOTO27
Asset class
- CQTM
- Stocks
- FOTO
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in CQTM19
- In both0
- Only in FOTO27
Only in CQTM
19 securities, 99.8% of CQTM by weight
- IonQ Inc17.66%
- D-Wave Quantum Inc8.38%
- Quantinuum Inc7.72%
- Rigetti Computing Inc7.57%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20316.50%
- International Business Machines Corp6.49%
- Honeywell International Inc5.17%
- Alphabet Inc5.06%
- Infleqtion Inc4.97%
- Quantum Computing Inc4.52%
- Horizon Quantum Holdings LTD4.20%
- Arqit Quantum Inc4.05%
- IQM Quantum Computers Oyj3.60%
- FormFactor Inc3.45%
- BTQ Technologies Corp3.09%
- Quantum Emotion Corp2.49%
- SEALSQ Corp2.19%
- Pasqal Holding SA1.37%
- Xanadu Quantum Technologies Ltd1.37%
Only in FOTO
27 securities, 100% of FOTO by weight
- Recv Foto Trs Lite Eq10.74%
- Recv Foto Trs Ipgp Eq8.65%
- Recv Foto Trs Fn Eq8.58%
- Recv Foto Trs Cohr Eq7.35%
- Lumentum Holdings Inc6.91%
- Ipg Photonics Corp6.79%
- Recv Foto Trs Lasr Eq5.16%
- Recv Foto Trs Viav Eq4.84%
- Recv Foto Trs Cien Eq4.84%
- Ciena Corp4.33%
- Viavi Solutions Inc3.49%
- Coherent Corp Common Stock3.28%
- nLight Inc.3.21%
- Recv Foto Trs Novt Eq3.19%
- Fabrinet3.09%
- Recv Foto Trs Mksi Eq3.05%
- Recv Foto Trs Plab Eq2.67%
- Novanta Inc2.32%
- Applied Optoelectronics Inc2.28%
- MKS Instruments Inc1.94%
- Sivers Ima Holding Ab1.71%
- Photronics Inc1.51%
- Poet Technologies Inc Common Stock1.43%
- Recv Foto Trs Aeva Eq1.42%
- Recv Foto Trs Lwlg Eq1.25%
- Aeva Technologies, Inc. Common Stock0.68%
- Lightwave Logic Inc0.50%
Weight gaps
CQTM and FOTO share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CQTM vs FOTO Cost
Overpaying FOTO vs CQTM
$7,356
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CQTM 0.35%
$7,126
FOTO 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CQTM | FOTO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $1,336 | $702 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $5,078 | $2,624 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $14,482 | $7,356 |
- 0.35%CQTM, cheaper
- 0.75%FOTO
- Middle half of Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
- Median 0.54%
CQTM cheapest of 8 funds
FOTO 7th cheapest of 8 funds
CQTM vs FOTO Dividends
- CQTM None
- FOTO None
Distribution history
CQTM vs FOTO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- CQTM 4.43FOTO 1.72
CQTM and FOTO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




