Skip to content

CQTM vs FOTO

Corgi Quantum Computing ETF

CQTMBCboe

Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF

FOTODCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

CQTM −0.40pt a year

CQTM0.35%FOTO0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

FOTO 15.6×the volume

CQTM21.1KFOTO329K

CQTM vs FOTO Performance

Aug 6, 2026 – Nov 6, 2026

−29.4%CQTM−39.2%FOTO

Aug 6, 2026 to Nov 6, 2026. CQTM −29.4%. FOTO −39.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%0%10%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CQTM 0.35%, better
FOTO 0.75%
Fund size
CQTM $15M
FOTO $71M
Holdings
CQTM 20
FOTO 28
Avg volume (30D)
CQTM 21.1K sh
FOTO 329K sh, better
NAV per share
CQTM $17.56
FOTO $11.51
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CQTM: Cost 88, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 49, Durability 55. FOTO: Cost 22, Risk 28, Mission not scored, Tradability 73, Holdings 36, Durability 53.
Pillar letters and Scores for CQTM, FOTO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCQTMFOTO
Cost30% weightA88HigherF22
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC51HigherD28
Tradability15% weightC50A73Higher
Holdings10% weightC49HigherD36
Durability5% weightB55HigherC53

Rank among Quantum Computing & Photonics funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CQTM and FOTO are both graded against the same 8 Quantum Computing & Photonics funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 8 ›

CQTM ranks 3rd and FOTO 7th of 8 funds in the Quantum Computing & Photonics Category.

  1. Rank 1AEUVCorgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AWQTMWisdomTree Quantum Computing FundScore 75
  3. Rank 3BCQTMCorgi Quantum Computing ETFScore 65
  4. Rank 4CLYTERoundhill Photonics & Optics ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 6DLAZRTema Photonics & Optical ETFScore 38
  6. Rank 7DFOTOTuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETFScore 37
  7. XQBTNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CQTMBCorgi Quantum Computing ETF

FOTODTuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF

In short

CQTM An active take on the quantum race that plays both sides: the companies building the machines and the ones building security meant to survive them. Fee is 0.35% a year, under the typical global thematic fund.

FOTO Photonics with a purity test: holdings must earn at least half their revenue from the business of moving data as light instead of electricity. About 40 global names, actively managed, and per its prospectus income comes first, generated with a systematic put spread strategy.

Stated mandate

CQTM The Fund's stated aim is to increase the value of shareholders' investments.

FOTO The Fund seeks current income and, secondarily, long-term capital appreciation. It targets photonics-related companies and uses a systematic put spread strategy to generate income.

Why people hold it

  • CQTM 0.35% a year, comfortably below the median fee for the global thematic funds we grade.
  • The 80% mandate stretches past hardware: quantum-enabled technologies and post-quantum security are in scope, so defense against quantum counts alongside the build-out.
  • Actively managed and global in reach (US and international names), so the manager can rotate as the field moves instead of waiting on an index committee.
  • Lands in the upper half of its global thematic peer group in our grading, with no structural red flags on the wrapper (a standard 1940 Act fund).
  • FOTO The pure-play screen has teeth: companies must derive at least 50% of revenue or operating profit from photonics, so the theme is not padded with megacap filler.nasdaq.com
  • The theme is spelled out, not vague: optical communications, silicon photonics, LiDAR, industrial lasers and optoelectronic devices, drawn from a global opportunity set.fotoetf.com
  • Income leads the mandate, pursued with a systematic put spread strategy. That is an unusual build for a frontier-tech theme where cohort rivals chase appreciation alone.
  • Actively traded since its 2026 launch, with listed options on Cboe and EDGX, so sizing and hedging tools exist alongside the shares.nasdaq.com

Worth knowing

  • CQTM Launched in 2026, so the track record is short, and volatility has screened high even by single-theme standards. Our read on its risk rests on limited history.
  • Small asset base and light trading volume, which tends to mean wider gaps between the buy and sell price than on household-name ETFs.
  • The mandate targets capital appreciation and the fund has not been paying regular distributions, so this is a price-return holding.
  • FOTO At 0.75%, the fee runs more than double the cohort median of 0.35%. Theme neighbors EUV (0.35%) and QTUP (0.00%) charge less for adjacent exposure.
  • Non-diversified and roughly 40 names deep, with part of the exposure taken through swaps rather than shares, which layers counterparty risk onto a concentrated basket.fotoetf.comyahoo.com
  • Put spread premium moves with volatility, and the short leg absorbs declines down to the long strike. Income from that engine is variable by design, not fixed.

Full CQTM profile⁠

Full FOTO profile⁠

CQTM vs FOTO Holdings

How CQTM and FOTO differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile74.0%
  • Sector4 Sectors89.1%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in CQTM and FOTO, widest gap first
SectorMore in CQTMMore in FOTOGap
TechnologyFOTO +9.3 points
IndustrialsCQTM +5.5 points
CommunicationCQTM +5.3 points
MaterialsFOTO +1.6 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CQTM and FOTO, widest gap first
CountryMore in CQTMMore in FOTOGap
United StatesFOTO +24.2 points
CanadaCQTM +7.4 points
SingaporeCQTM +5.4 points
FinlandCQTM +4.6 points
United KingdomCQTM +4.0 points
SwitzerlandCQTM +2.7 points
FranceCQTM +1.8 points
SwedenFOTO +1.8 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CQTM74.0%
  • FOTO181.0%

Securities held

  • CQTM19
  • FOTO27

Asset class

CQTM
Stocks
FOTO
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in CQTM19
  • In both0
  • Only in FOTO27

Only in CQTM

19 securities, 99.8% of CQTM by weight

  • IonQ Inc17.66%
  • D-Wave Quantum Inc8.38%
  • Quantinuum Inc7.72%

Only in FOTO

27 securities, 100% of FOTO by weight

  • Recv Foto Trs Lite Eq10.74%
  • Recv Foto Trs Ipgp Eq8.65%
  • Recv Foto Trs Fn Eq8.58%

Weight gaps

CQTM and FOTO share no securities.

All 30 CQTM holdings⁠All 41 FOTO holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CQTM vs FOTO Cost

Overpaying FOTO vs CQTM

$7,356

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CQTM 0.35%

    $7,126

  • FOTO 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CQTM 0.35%
  • FOTO 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530FOTO $14,482CQTM $7,126

Year by year

YearCQTMFOTOOverpaying
10$634$1,336$702
20$2,454$5,078$2,624
30$7,126$14,482$7,356

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%CQTM, cheaper
  • 0.75%FOTO
  • Middle half of Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
  • Median 0.54%

CQTM cheapest of 8 funds

FOTO 7th cheapest of 8 funds

CQTM vs FOTO Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 6, 2026
Payout (12M)
CQTM None
FOTO None

Distribution history

CQTMAll CQTM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FOTOAll FOTO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CQTM vs FOTO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CQTM 4.43FOTO 1.72

CQTM and FOTO in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CQTMBvsEUVA

    Corgi Quantum Computing ETF · Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FOTODvsEUVA

    Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF · Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CQTMBvsWQTMA

    Corgi Quantum Computing ETF · WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FOTODvsWQTMA

    Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF · WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CQTMBvsLYTEC

    Corgi Quantum Computing ETF · Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FOTODvsLYTEC

    Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF · Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.