FOWF ranks 4th and GCAD 14th of 25 funds in the Defense & Aerospace Category.
FOWF vs GCAD
FOWF −0.41pt a year
0.49%0.90%
GCAD 3.5×the volume
1.79K6.21K
FOWF vs GCAD Performance
+12.2%+11.2%
- FOWF 0.49%, better
- GCAD 0.90%
- FOWF $15M
- GCAD $45M
- FOWF +12.2%, better
- GCAD +11.2%
- FOWF 0.74%
- GCAD 1.91%, better
- FOWF 88
- GCAD 57
- FOWF 1.79K sh
- GCAD 6.21K sh, better
- FOWF $35.06
- GCAD $49.94
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FOWF | GCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C52Higher | F12 |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | A89Higher | A76 |
| Tradability | C46Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | A75Higher | B59 |
| Durability | B64Higher | C53 |
Rank among Defense & Aerospace funds
Same Category. FOWF and GCAD are both graded against the same 25 Defense & Aerospace funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FOWFB
GCADC
In short
FOWF Most defense funds are built around the old primes. FOWF tracks the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, aimed at companies behind emerging defense technology across the U.S. and allied nations.
GCAD A stock-picker's defense fund. Gabelli runs GCAD without a declared index, chasing total return with an emphasis on income, an unusual mandate in a corner of the market where index trackers set the rules.
Stated mandate
FOWF The Fund seeks capital appreciation by tracking companies that support critical emerging defense technologies in the U.S. and its allied nations.
GCAD The Fund seeks a high level of total return, emphasizing income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FOWF vs GCAD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FOWF vs GCAD Cost
Overpaying GCAD vs FOWF
$7,248
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FOWF 0.49%
$9,792
GCAD 0.90%
$17,040
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FOWF | GCAD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $1,593 | $710 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $6,015 | $2,621 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $17,040 | $7,248 |
- 0.49%FOWF, cheaper
- 0.90%GCAD
- Middle half of Defense & Aerospace funds
- Median 0.50%
FOWF 11th cheapest of 25 funds
GCAD 22nd cheapest of 25 funds
FOWF vs GCAD Dividends
- FOWF 0.74%
- GCAD 1.91%, better
- FOWF $0.26
- GCAD $0.96
- FOWF $0.06
- GCAD $0.96
- FOWF Sep 3, 2026
- GCAD Dec 29, 2025
- FOWF Sep 8, 2026
- GCAD Jan 9, 2026
- FOWF Quarterly
- GCAD Annual
Distribution history
FOWF vs GCAD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FOWF 13.1%GCAD 17.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- FOWF 1.36GCAD 1.25
- Worst fall
- FOWF −12.3%GCAD −17.8%
- Market sensitivity
- FOWF 0.55GCAD 0.99
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.