INTF ranks 1st and FPA 29th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
FPA vs INTF
INTF −0.64pt a year
0.80%0.16%
INTF 26.5×the volume
11.7K310K
INTF +1.3pt
+8.2%+9.5%
FPA vs INTF Performance
+66.5%+65.9%
- FPA 0.80%
- INTF 0.16%, better
- FPA $103M
- INTF $3.67B
- FPA +20.0%, better
- INTF +18.7%
- FPA 4.42%, better
- INTF 2.98%
- FPA 104
- INTF 500
- FPA 11.7K sh
- INTF 310K sh, better
- FPA $43.89
- INTF $40.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FPA | INTF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | A98Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F18 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | F22 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | D37 | B68Higher |
| Durability | C45 | A86Higher |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. FPA and INTF are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FPAF
INTFA
In short
FPA A rare cut of the map: developed Asia-Pacific with Japan left out, run through First Trust's AlphaDEX growth-and-value screen instead of plain market-cap weighting. About 100 names, live since 2011.
INTF Five factors at once (value, quality, momentum, low volatility, low size) aimed at developed markets outside the US, for 0.16% a year. That is well under half what the typical international multifactor fund charges.
Stated mandate
FPA The fund seeks before-fee results that generally track the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index. The index uses Nasdaq's AlphaDEX methodology to select stocks from the developed-markets Asia-Pacific universe excluding Japan.
INTF The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks chosen using value, quality, momentum, low-volatility, and low-size factors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FPA vs INTF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FPA vs INTF Cost
Overpaying FPA vs INTF
$12,004
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FPA 0.80%
$15,346
INTF 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FPA | INTF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $292 | $1,130 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $1,141 | $4,252 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $3,342 | $12,004 |
- 0.80%FPA
- 0.16%INTF, cheaper
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
INTF 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
FPA 27th cheapest of 30 funds
FPA vs INTF Dividends
- FPA 4.42%, better
- INTF 2.98%
- FPA $1.94
- INTF $1.24
- FPA $0.37
- INTF $0.72
- FPA Sep 24, 2026
- INTF Jun 15, 2026
- FPA Sep 30, 2026
- INTF Jun 18, 2026
- FPA Quarterly
- INTF Twice a year
Distribution history
FPA vs INTF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FPA
- INTF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FPA 27.3%INTF 11.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FPA 0.88INTF 1.45, better
- Worst fall
- FPA −27.8%INTF −27.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FPA 1.60INTF 0.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.