IMCV ranks 4th and FSCS 83rd of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FSCS vs IMCV
IMCV −0.54pt a year
0.60%0.06%
IMCV 6.8×the volume
5.74K38.9K
IMCV +5.0pt
+6.0%+11.0%
FSCS vs IMCV Performance
+34.0%+68.3%
- FSCS 0.60%
- IMCV 0.06%, better
- FSCS $61M
- IMCV $1.27B
- FSCS +7.7%
- IMCV +27.0%, better
- FSCS 1.23%
- IMCV 1.84%, better
- FSCS 101
- IMCV 271
- FSCS 5.74K sh
- IMCV 38.9K sh, better
- FSCS $37.13
- IMCV $99.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FSCS | IMCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | A96Higher |
| Mission | B64 | A76Higher |
| Risk | C41 | A77Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | B69Higher |
| Durability | D38 | A77Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FSCS and IMCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FSCSC
IMCVA
In short
FSCS First Trust pointed its Capital Strength screen at the small and mid cap end of the US market: about 100 names picked by rule, not hunch, filtered for quality, growth and lower volatility.
Stated mandate
FSCS The Fund seeks investment results generally corresponding to the price and yield, before fees and expenses, of the SMID Capital Strength Index. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets, plus investment borrowings, in index securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FSCS vs IMCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FSCS vs IMCV Cost
Overpaying FSCS vs IMCV
$10,547
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FSCS 0.60%
$11,817
IMCV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FSCS | IMCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $110 | $966 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $432 | $3,684 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $1,270 | $10,547 |
- 0.60%FSCS
- 0.06%IMCV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
IMCV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
FSCS 82nd cheapest of 99 funds
FSCS vs IMCV Dividends
- FSCS 1.23%
- IMCV 1.84%, better
- FSCS $0.46
- IMCV $1.83
- FSCS $0.14
- IMCV $0.52
- FSCS Sep 24, 2026
- IMCV Sep 15, 2026
- FSCS Sep 30, 2026
- IMCV Sep 18, 2026
- FSCS Quarterly
- IMCV Quarterly
Distribution history
FSCS vs IMCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FSCS
- IMCV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FSCS 14.7%IMCV 13.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FSCS 0.64IMCV 1.22, better
- Worst fall
- FSCS −21.2%IMCV −19.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FSCS 0.76IMCV 0.88
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.