VONV ranks 1st and FSCS 83rd of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FSCS vs VONV
VONV −0.54pt a year
0.60%0.06%
VONV 134.7×the volume
5.74K774K
VONV +5.7pt
+6.0%+11.7%
FSCS vs VONV Performance
+34.0%+73.8%
- FSCS 0.60%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- FSCS $61M
- VONV $23.3B
- FSCS +7.7%
- VONV +28.5%, better
- FSCS 1.23%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- FSCS 101
- VONV 873
- FSCS 5.74K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- FSCS $37.13
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FSCS | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | A96Higher |
| Mission | B64 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C41 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | B65Higher | C49 |
| Durability | D38 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FSCS and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FSCSC
VONVA
In short
FSCS First Trust pointed its Capital Strength screen at the small and mid cap end of the US market: about 100 names picked by rule, not hunch, filtered for quality, growth and lower volatility.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
FSCS The Fund seeks investment results generally corresponding to the price and yield, before fees and expenses, of the SMID Capital Strength Index. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets, plus investment borrowings, in index securities.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FSCS vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FSCS vs VONV Cost
Overpaying FSCS vs VONV
$10,547
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FSCS 0.60%
$11,817
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FSCS | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $110 | $966 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $432 | $3,684 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $1,270 | $10,547 |
- 0.60%FSCS
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
FSCS 82nd cheapest of 99 funds
FSCS vs VONV Dividends
- FSCS 1.23%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- FSCS $0.46
- VONV $1.74
- FSCS $0.14
- VONV $0.42
- FSCS Sep 24, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- FSCS Sep 30, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- FSCS Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
FSCS vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FSCS
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FSCS 14.7%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FSCS 0.64VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- FSCS −21.2%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FSCS 0.76VONV 0.85
FSCS and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

