VYM ranks 2nd and FSCS 83rd of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FSCS vs VYM
VYM −0.56pt a year
0.60%0.04%
VYM 198.9×the volume
5.74K1.14M
VYM +5.8pt
+6.0%+11.8%
FSCS vs VYM Performance
+34.0%+74.3%
- FSCS 0.60%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- FSCS $61M
- VYM $95.8B
- FSCS +7.7%
- VYM +19.3%, better
- FSCS 1.23%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- FSCS 101
- VYM 601
- FSCS 5.74K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- FSCS $37.13
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FSCS | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | A99Higher |
| Mission | B64 | A79Higher |
| Risk | C41 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | B65Higher | C53 |
| Durability | D38 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FSCS and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FSCSC
VYMA
In short
FSCS First Trust pointed its Capital Strength screen at the small and mid cap end of the US market: about 100 names picked by rule, not hunch, filtered for quality, growth and lower volatility.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
FSCS The Fund seeks investment results generally corresponding to the price and yield, before fees and expenses, of the SMID Capital Strength Index. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets, plus investment borrowings, in index securities.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FSCS vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FSCS vs VYM Cost
Overpaying FSCS vs VYM
$10,968
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FSCS 0.60%
$11,817
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FSCS | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $73 | $1,003 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $288 | $3,828 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $849 | $10,968 |
- 0.60%FSCS
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
FSCS 82nd cheapest of 99 funds
FSCS vs VYM Dividends
- FSCS 1.23%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- FSCS $0.46
- VYM $3.68
- FSCS $0.14
- VYM $0.89
- FSCS Sep 24, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- FSCS Sep 30, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- FSCS Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
FSCS vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FSCS
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FSCS 14.7%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FSCS 0.64VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- FSCS −21.2%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FSCS 0.76VYM 0.75
FSCS and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



