SPYG ranks 1st and FSGS 34th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
FSGS vs SPYG
SPYG −0.56pt a year
0.60%0.04%
SPYG 2045.5×the volume
1.12K2.28M
SPYG +7.4pt
+4.2%+11.6%
FSGS vs SPYG Performance
+22.7%+73.4%
- FSGS 0.60%
- SPYG 0.04%, better
- FSGS $30M
- SPYG $55.5B
- FSGS +8.9%, better
- SPYG +8.3%
- FSGS 0.03%
- SPYG 0.50%, better
- FSGS 101
- SPYG 154
- FSGS 1.12K sh
- SPYG 2.28M sh, better
- FSGS $33.07
- SPYG $119.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FSGS | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A96Higher |
| Mission | C50 | A98Higher |
| Risk | C54 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | D33 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | A75Higher | D38 |
| Durability | D28 | A79Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. FSGS and SPYG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FSGSD
SPYGA
In short
FSGS Growth only after the balance sheet passes inspection: FSGS screens small and mid caps for cash, low debt and double-digit return on equity, then ranks survivors on three-year revenue and cash flow growth. About 100 names, equally weighted.
SPYG The growth half of the S&P 500 for 0.04% a year, running since 2000. No exotic screen, no reinvention: just the index's fastest-growing names, in the cheapest wrapper tracking that index.
Stated mandate
FSGS The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield of The SMID Growth Strength Index before fees and expenses.
SPYG The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P 500 Growth Index. It provides exposure to S&P 500 companies selected for strong growth characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FSGS vs SPYG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FSGS vs SPYG Cost
Overpaying FSGS vs SPYG
$10,968
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FSGS 0.60%
$11,817
SPYG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FSGS | SPYG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $73 | $1,003 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $288 | $3,828 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $849 | $10,968 |
- 0.60%FSGS
- 0.04%SPYG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
SPYG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
FSGS 32nd cheapest of 35 funds
FSGS vs SPYG Dividends
- FSGS 0.03%
- SPYG 0.50%, better
- FSGS $0.01
- SPYG $0.59
- FSGS $0.01
- SPYG $0.15
- FSGS Jun 25, 2026
- SPYG Sep 21, 2026
- FSGS Jun 30, 2026
- SPYG Sep 23, 2026
- FSGS Irregular
- SPYG Quarterly
Distribution history
FSGS vs SPYG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FSGS
- SPYG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FSGS 16.3%, betterSPYG 16.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- FSGS 0.52SPYG 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- FSGS −24.1%, betterSPYG −32.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FSGS 0.99SPYG 1.17
FSGS and SPYG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

