Skip to content

FSGS vs SCHG

First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF

FSGSDNasdaq

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

SCHGANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.8%by weight

Expense ratio

SCHG −0.56pt a year

FSGS0.60%SCHG0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

SCHG 6804.8×the volume

FSGS1.12KSCHG7.59M

5Y return · a year

SCHG +7.6pt

FSGS+4.2%SCHG+11.8%

FSGS vs SCHG Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+22.7%FSGS+74.3%SCHG

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FSGS +22.7%. SCHG +74.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%50%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FSGS 0.60%
SCHG 0.04%, better
Fund size
FSGS $30M
SCHG $61.7B
1Y total return
FSGS +8.9%, better
SCHG +3.3%
Yield (12M)
FSGS 0.03%
SCHG 0.40%, better
Holdings
FSGS 101
SCHG 187
Avg volume (30D)
FSGS 1.12K sh
SCHG 7.59M sh, better
NAV per share
FSGS $33.07
SCHG $34.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FSGS: Cost 6, Risk 54, Mission 50, Tradability 33, Holdings 75, Durability 28. SCHG: Cost 96, Risk 41, Mission 92, Tradability 87, Holdings 36, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for FSGS, SCHG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFSGSSCHG
Cost30% weightF6A96Higher
Mission25% weightC50A92Higher
Risk15% weightC54HigherC41
Tradability15% weightD33A87Higher
Holdings10% weightA75HigherD36
Durability5% weightD28A75Higher

Rank among US Growth Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FSGS and SCHG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Growth Index⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

SCHG ranks 2nd and FSGS 34th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AILCGiShares Morningstar Growth ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 2AIMCGiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  4. Rank 2ASCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  5. Rank 5AVUGVanguard Morningstar Growth ETFScore 77
  6. Rank 32CRKSGRuk Strategic Growth ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 34DFSGSFirst Trust SMID Growth Strength ETFScore 36
  8. Rank 35DBULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETFScore 29

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FSGSDFirst Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF

SCHGASchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

In short

FSGS Growth only after the balance sheet passes inspection: FSGS screens small and mid caps for cash, low debt and double-digit return on equity, then ranks survivors on three-year revenue and cash flow growth. About 100 names, equally weighted.

SCHG Schwab's growth workhorse: roughly 200 large-cap U.S. growth names for four basis points, one of the cheapest tickets in a crowded category. Running since 2009 and among the most heavily traded growth funds around.

Stated mandate

FSGS The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield of The SMID Growth Strength Index before fees and expenses.

SCHG SCHG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in stocks included in that index, which represents large-cap U.S. growth equities.

Why people hold it

  • FSGS Quality gate comes first: at least $100 million in cash, long-term debt under 30% of market cap, positive equity, positive revenue and cash flow, and ROE above 10%.ftportfolios.com
  • Growth ranking is backward-looking and concrete: three-year revenue growth and three-year cash flow growth, weighted equally. No analyst forecasts in the recipe.ftportfolios.com
  • Equal weighting across about 100 stocks, reset quarterly, so one hot name cannot quietly become the fund. A different shape from cap-weighted growth indexes.ftportfolios.com
  • Small and mid caps put it in a different lane from the megacap-heavy growth funds that lead this category, including SPYG, SCHG and VUG.nasdaq.com
  • SCHG 0.04% a year against a growth-category median of 0.18%. Costs sit near the floor of the group.
  • Hews closely to the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, one of the tighter index implementations in its peer group.
  • Live since 2009, a multi-billion-dollar fund, and one of the busier tickers in the growth aisle, so entering and exiting is usually cheap and easy.
  • The benchmark is carved out of a total-market growth index, not S&P 500 membership, so a stock does not need an index committee's nod to qualify.

Worth knowing

  • FSGS At 0.60% with no waiver, it sits above the category median, and well above cap-weighted options like VUG at 0.03% and mid-cap growth fund IMCG at 0.06%.
  • The ticker dates to 2017, but it tracked a different index until late 2024, so the live record for this strategy is short.sec.gov
  • One of the smaller, more lightly traded funds in the growth group, so spreads can run wider than in the category's giants.
  • SCHG Growth-only by design. Value and dividend-heavy corners of the market sit outside the mandate, so the ride differs from a total-market fund.
  • Large-cap U.S. only, roughly 200 stocks. No mid-caps, no small-caps, nothing overseas.
  • VUG charges a hair less for a similar broad-growth mandate. A tiny gap, but it is there. Distributions here arrive quarterly.

Full FSGS profile⁠

Full SCHG profile⁠

FSGS vs SCHG Holdings

How FSGS and SCHG differ

Overlap by weight

0.8%

Shared holdings make up 19.5% of FSGS and 0.8% of SCHG.

Level by level

  • Holdings20 in both0.8%
  • Sector11 Sectors56.8%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile99.8%

Sector

Sector weights in FSGS and SCHG, widest gap first
SectorMore in FSGSMore in SCHG
TechnologySCHG +29.2 points
Health CareFSGS +15.8 points
FinancialsFSGS +14.3 points
CommunicationSCHG +12.2 points
IndustrialsFSGS +5.1 points
Consumer StaplesFSGS +2.8 points
EnergyFSGS +2.6 points
Real EstateFSGS +2.6 points
MaterialsSCHG +0.9 points
Consumer DiscretionarySCHG +0.5 points
UtilitiesSCHG +0.4 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FSGS and SCHG, widest gap first
CountryMore in FSGSMore in SCHG
United StatesFSGS +0.2 points
ChinaSCHG +0.2 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FSGS11.2%
  • SCHG59.9%

Securities held

  • FSGS100
  • SCHG187

Asset class

FSGS
Equity
SCHG
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FSGS80
  • In both20
  • Only in SCHG167

Only in FSGS

80 securities, 80.4% of FSGS by weight

  • AvePoint, Inc.1.17%
  • Arlo Technologies, Inc.1.17%
  • Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated1.15%

Only in SCHG

167 securities, 99.2% of SCHG by weight

  • NVIDIA12.10%
  • Apple11.92%
  • Microsoft9.21%

Weight gaps

All 20 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FSGS and SCHG, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FSGSMore in SCHG
DocuSign, Inc.DOCUFSGS +1.04 points
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.TXRHFSGS +1.03 points
Five Below, Inc.FIVEFSGS +1.02 points
Tradeweb Markets Inc. (Class A)TWFSGS +1.02 points
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.NBIXFSGS +1.01 points
Elastic N.V.ESTCFSGS +1.01 points
Insulet CorporationPODDFSGS +1.01 points
Paycom Software, Inc.PAYCFSGS +1.00 points

All 100 FSGS holdings⁠All 189 SCHG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FSGS vs SCHG Cost

Overpaying FSGS vs SCHG

$10,968

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FSGS 0.60%

    $11,817

  • SCHG 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FSGS 0.60%
  • SCHG 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530FSGS $11,817SCHG $849

Year by year

YearFSGSSCHGOverpaying
10$1,076$73$1,003
20$4,116$288$3,828
30$11,817$849$10,968

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%FSGS
  • 0.04%SCHG, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Growth Index funds
  • Median 0.18%

SCHG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds

FSGS 32nd cheapest of 35 funds

FSGS vs SCHG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FSGS 0.03%
SCHG 0.40%, better
Payout (12M)
FSGS $0.01
SCHG $0.14
Last payment
FSGS $0.01
SCHG $0.04
Ex-dividend
FSGS Jun 25, 2026
SCHG Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
FSGS Jun 30, 2026
SCHG Sep 28, 2026
Frequency
FSGS Irregular
SCHG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FSGSIrregular · 30 paymentsAll FSGS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 30 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Sep 21, 2017 $0.07; Dec 21, 2017 $0.18; Mar 22, 2018 $0.04; Jun 21, 2018 $0.12; Sep 14, 2018 $0.09; Dec 18, 2018 $0.15; Mar 21, 2019 $0.05; Jun 14, 2019 $0.10; Sep 25, 2019 $0.10; Dec 13, 2019 $0.15; Mar 26, 2020 $0.0077; Jun 25, 2020 $0.09; Sep 24, 2020 $0.07; Dec 24, 2020 $0.15; Jun 24, 2021 $0.10; Sep 23, 2021 $0.12; Dec 23, 2021 $0.18; Mar 25, 2022 $0.04; Jun 24, 2022 $0.11; Sep 23, 2022 $0.15; Dec 23, 2022 $0.20; Mar 24, 2023 $0.10; Jun 27, 2023 $0.17; Sep 22, 2023 $0.13; Dec 22, 2023 $0.26; Mar 21, 2024 $0.04; Jun 27, 2024 $0.23; Sep 26, 2024 $0.14; Dec 13, 2024 $0.39; Jun 25, 2026 $0.01. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
SCHGQuarterly · 42 paymentsAll SCHG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 42 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2017 $0.02; Jun 19, 2017 $0.02; Sep 18, 2017 $0.03; Dec 18, 2017 $0.02; Mar 16, 2018 $0.02; Jun 26, 2018 $0.02; Sep 25, 2018 $0.02; Dec 12, 2018 $0.03; Dec 28, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.02; Jun 26, 2019 $0.03; Sep 25, 2019 $0.03; Dec 12, 2019 $0.02; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Jun 24, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.02; Dec 10, 2020 $0.02; Mar 24, 2021 $0.02; Jun 23, 2021 $0.02; Sep 22, 2021 $0.02; Dec 8, 2021 $0.03; Dec 30, 2021 $0.0051; Mar 23, 2022 $0.02; Jun 22, 2022 $0.02; Sep 21, 2022 $0.02; Dec 7, 2022 $0.02; Mar 22, 2023 $0.02; Jun 21, 2023 $0.02; Sep 20, 2023 $0.02; Dec 6, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.0063; Mar 20, 2024 $0.02; Jun 26, 2024 $0.03; Sep 25, 2024 $0.03; Dec 11, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.03; Jun 25, 2025 $0.03; Sep 24, 2025 $0.03; Dec 10, 2025 $0.03; Mar 25, 2026 $0.04; Jun 24, 2026 $0.03; Sep 23, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

FSGS vs SCHG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FSGS
  • SCHG
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: SCHG −34.6% · Jan 2023. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FSGS 16.3%, betterSCHG 16.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FSGS 0.52SCHG 1.16, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FSGS −24.1%, betterSCHG −34.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FSGS 0.99SCHG 1.20

FSGS and SCHG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FSGSDvsSPYGA

    First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHGAvsSPYGA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FSGSDvsILCGA

    First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHGAvsILCGA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FSGSDvsIMCGA

    First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHGAvsIMCGA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.