Skip to content

FSGS vs IMCG

First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF

FSGSDNasdaq

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

IMCGANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

IMCG −0.54pt a year

FSGS0.60%IMCG0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

IMCG 118.6×the volume

FSGS1.12KIMCG132K

5Y return · a year

IMCG +1.3pt

FSGS+4.2%IMCG+5.5%

FSGS vs IMCG Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+22.7%FSGS+30.8%IMCG

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FSGS +22.7%. IMCG +30.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FSGS 0.60%
IMCG 0.06%, better
Fund size
FSGS $30M
IMCG $4.04B
1Y total return
FSGS +8.9%
IMCG +14.0%, better
Yield (12M)
FSGS 0.03%
IMCG 0.67%, better
Holdings
FSGS 101
IMCG 262
Avg volume (30D)
FSGS 1.12K sh
IMCG 132K sh, better
NAV per share
FSGS $33.07
IMCG $93.24
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FSGS: Cost 6, Risk 54, Mission 50, Tradability 33, Holdings 75, Durability 28. IMCG: Cost 78, Risk 78, Mission 95, Tradability 61, Holdings 75, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for FSGS, IMCG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFSGSIMCG
Cost30% weightF6A78Higher
Mission25% weightC50A95Higher
Risk15% weightC54A78Higher
Tradability15% weightD33B61Higher
Holdings10% weightA75A75
Durability5% weightD28B66Higher

Rank among US Growth Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FSGS and IMCG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Growth Index⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

IMCG ranks 2nd and FSGS 34th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AILCGiShares Morningstar Growth ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 2AIMCGiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  4. Rank 2ASCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  5. Rank 32CRKSGRuk Strategic Growth ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 34DFSGSFirst Trust SMID Growth Strength ETFScore 36
  7. Rank 35DBULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETFScore 29

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FSGSDFirst Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF

IMCGAiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

In short

FSGS Growth only after the balance sheet passes inspection: FSGS screens small and mid caps for cash, low debt and double-digit return on equity, then ranks survivors on three-year revenue and cash flow growth. About 100 names, equally weighted.

IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.

Stated mandate

FSGS The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield of The SMID Growth Strength Index before fees and expenses.

IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.

Why people hold it

  • FSGS Quality gate comes first: at least $100 million in cash, long-term debt under 30% of market cap, positive equity, positive revenue and cash flow, and ROE above 10%.ftportfolios.com
  • Growth ranking is backward-looking and concrete: three-year revenue growth and three-year cash flow growth, weighted equally. No analyst forecasts in the recipe.ftportfolios.com
  • Equal weighting across about 100 stocks, reset quarterly, so one hot name cannot quietly become the fund. A different shape from cap-weighted growth indexes.ftportfolios.com
  • Small and mid caps put it in a different lane from the megacap-heavy growth funds that lead this category, including SPYG, SCHG and VUG.nasdaq.com
  • IMCG 0.06% a year, one third of the 0.18% median for its growth-fund peer group. Mid-cap indexing at large-cap-index prices.
  • The growth leaderboard is stacked with large-cap funds (VUG, SCHG, SPYG, VONG). IMCG covers the middle instead, holding about 300 mid-cap growth names.
  • Sticks close to the Morningstar mid-cap growth index it follows, one of the tighter tracking jobs in its peer group.
  • Running since 2004 under the iShares roof, with a multi-billion-dollar asset base behind it.

Worth knowing

  • FSGS At 0.60% with no waiver, it sits above the category median, and well above cap-weighted options like VUG at 0.03% and mid-cap growth fund IMCG at 0.06%.
  • The ticker dates to 2017, but it tracked a different index until late 2024, so the live record for this strategy is short.sec.gov
  • One of the smaller, more lightly traded funds in the growth group, so spreads can run wider than in the category's giants.
  • IMCG Moderately traded rather than heavily traded, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the megacap growth ETFs sitting beside it in the category.
  • This is a size-and-style bet. Mid-cap growth companies tend to move more sharply than the broad market, in both directions.
  • Distributions land quarterly, but a growth screen is not built around income.

Full FSGS profile⁠

Full IMCG profile⁠

FSGS vs IMCG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FSGS vs IMCG Cost

Overpaying FSGS vs IMCG

$10,547

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FSGS 0.60%

    $11,817

  • IMCG 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FSGS 0.60%
  • IMCG 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530FSGS $11,817IMCG $1,270

Year by year

YearFSGSIMCGOverpaying
10$1,076$110$966
20$4,116$432$3,684
30$11,817$1,270$10,547

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%FSGS
  • 0.06%IMCG, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Growth Index funds
  • Median 0.18%

IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds

FSGS 32nd cheapest of 35 funds

FSGS vs IMCG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FSGS 0.03%
IMCG 0.67%, better
Payout (12M)
FSGS $0.01
IMCG $0.62
Last payment
FSGS $0.01
IMCG $0.19
Ex-dividend
FSGS Jun 25, 2026
IMCG Sep 15, 2026
Paid on
FSGS Jun 30, 2026
IMCG Sep 18, 2026
Frequency
FSGS Irregular
IMCG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FSGSIrregular · 30 paymentsAll FSGS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 30 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Sep 21, 2017 $0.07; Dec 21, 2017 $0.18; Mar 22, 2018 $0.04; Jun 21, 2018 $0.12; Sep 14, 2018 $0.09; Dec 18, 2018 $0.15; Mar 21, 2019 $0.05; Jun 14, 2019 $0.10; Sep 25, 2019 $0.10; Dec 13, 2019 $0.15; Mar 26, 2020 $0.0077; Jun 25, 2020 $0.09; Sep 24, 2020 $0.07; Dec 24, 2020 $0.15; Jun 24, 2021 $0.10; Sep 23, 2021 $0.12; Dec 23, 2021 $0.18; Mar 25, 2022 $0.04; Jun 24, 2022 $0.11; Sep 23, 2022 $0.15; Dec 23, 2022 $0.20; Mar 24, 2023 $0.10; Jun 27, 2023 $0.17; Sep 22, 2023 $0.13; Dec 22, 2023 $0.26; Mar 21, 2024 $0.04; Jun 27, 2024 $0.23; Sep 26, 2024 $0.14; Dec 13, 2024 $0.39; Jun 25, 2026 $0.01. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
IMCGQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll IMCG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.03; Jun 27, 2017 $0.03; Sep 26, 2017 $0.05; Dec 19, 2017 $0.04; Mar 22, 2018 $0.03; Jun 26, 2018 $0.03; Sep 26, 2018 $0.02; Dec 17, 2018 $0.03; Mar 20, 2019 $0.02; Jun 17, 2019 $0.02; Sep 24, 2019 $0.02; Dec 16, 2019 $0.07; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Jun 15, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.01; Dec 14, 2020 $0.0067; Mar 25, 2021 $0.0083; Jun 10, 2021 $0.08; Sep 24, 2021 $0.10; Dec 13, 2021 $0.11; Mar 24, 2022 $0.10; Jun 9, 2022 $0.08; Sep 26, 2022 $0.14; Dec 13, 2022 $0.18; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Jun 7, 2023 $0.09; Sep 26, 2023 $0.15; Dec 20, 2023 $0.18; Mar 21, 2024 $0.13; Jun 11, 2024 $0.11; Sep 25, 2024 $0.18; Dec 17, 2024 $0.17; Mar 18, 2025 $0.12; Jun 16, 2025 $0.14; Sep 16, 2025 $0.16; Dec 16, 2025 $0.21; Mar 17, 2026 $0.12; Jun 15, 2026 $0.10; Sep 15, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

FSGS vs IMCG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FSGS
  • IMCG
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: IMCG −35.1% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FSGS 16.3%, betterIMCG 16.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FSGS 0.52IMCG 0.97, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FSGS −24.1%, betterIMCG −35.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FSGS 0.99IMCG 1.14

FSGS and IMCG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FSGSDvsSPYGA

    First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCGAvsSPYGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FSGSDvsILCGA

    First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCGAvsILCGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FSGSDvsSCHGA

    First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCGAvsSCHGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.