VUG ranks 5th and FSGS 34th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
FSGS vs VUG
VUG −0.57pt a year
0.60%0.03%
VUG 5665.1×the volume
1.12K6.32M
VUG +6.6pt
+4.2%+10.8%
FSGS vs VUG Performance
+22.7%+67.0%
- FSGS 0.60%
- VUG 0.03%, better
- FSGS $30M
- VUG $392B
- FSGS +8.9%, better
- VUG +2.7%
- FSGS 0.03%
- VUG 0.41%, better
- FSGS 101
- VUG 136
- FSGS 1.12K sh
- VUG 6.32M sh, better
- FSGS $33.07
- VUG $85.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FSGS | VUG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A96Higher |
| Mission | C50 | A99Higher |
| Risk | C54Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | D33 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A75Higher | D29 |
| Durability | D28 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. FSGS and VUG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FSGSD
VUGA
In short
FSGS Growth only after the balance sheet passes inspection: FSGS screens small and mid caps for cash, low debt and double-digit return on equity, then ranks survivors on three-year revenue and cash flow growth. About 100 names, equally weighted.
VUG Three basis points buys roughly 170 US large-cap growth names. Running since 2004, over $100 billion in assets, and it tracks its index about as closely as an index fund can.
Stated mandate
FSGS The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield of The SMID Growth Strength Index before fees and expenses.
VUG The fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of large-capitalization growth stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FSGS vs VUG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FSGS vs VUG Cost
Overpaying FSGS vs VUG
$11,179
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FSGS 0.60%
$11,817
VUG 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FSGS | VUG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $55 | $1,021 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $216 | $3,900 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $638 | $11,179 |
- 0.60%FSGS
- 0.03%VUG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
VUG cheapest of 35 funds
FSGS 32nd cheapest of 35 funds
FSGS vs VUG Dividends
- FSGS 0.03%
- VUG 0.41%, better
- FSGS $0.01
- VUG $0.35
- FSGS $0.01
- VUG $0.09
- FSGS Jun 25, 2026
- VUG Sep 28, 2026
- FSGS Jun 30, 2026
- VUG Sep 30, 2026
- FSGS Irregular
- VUG Quarterly
Distribution history
FSGS vs VUG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FSGS
- VUG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FSGS 16.3%, betterVUG 17.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- FSGS 0.52VUG 1.11, better
- Worst fall
- FSGS −24.1%, betterVUG −35.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FSGS 0.99VUG 1.23
FSGS and VUG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


