Skip to content

FTEC vs QQH

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

FTECANYSE Arca

HCM Defender 100 Index ETF

QQHFNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FTEC −0.92pt a year

FTEC0.08%QQH1.00%

Avg volume · 30D

FTEC 3.9×the volume

FTEC275KQQH70.9K

5Y return · a year

FTEC +8.9pt

FTEC+16.8%QQH+7.9%

FTEC vs QQH Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+117.0%FTEC+46.0%QQH

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. FTEC +117.0%. QQH +46.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%150%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FTEC 0.08%, better
QQH 1.00%
Fund size
FTEC $22.2B
QQH $713M
1Y total return
FTEC +15.4%, better
QQH −2.1%
Yield (12M)
FTEC 0.41%, better
QQH 0.21%
Holdings
FTEC 290
QQH 97
Avg volume (30D)
FTEC 275K sh, better
QQH 70.9K sh
NAV per share
FTEC $279.07
QQH $80.59
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FTEC: Cost 98, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings 38, Durability 73. QQH: Cost 0, Risk 50, Mission 98, Tradability 40, Holdings 33, Durability 36.
Pillar letters and Scores for FTEC, QQH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFTECQQH
Cost30% weightA98HigherF0
Mission25% weightNot scoredA98
Risk15% weightB60HigherC50
Tradability15% weightA88HigherC40
Holdings10% weightD38HigherD33
Durability5% weightA73HigherD36

Rank among Technology (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FTEC and QQH are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Technology (Broad)⁠

Category · 23 funds
See all 23 ›

FTEC ranks 2nd and QQH 20th of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLKState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2AFTECFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 3AVGTVanguard Information Technology ETFScore 71
  4. Rank 19DGTEKGoldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETFScore 28
  5. Rank 20FQQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETFScore 24
  6. Rank 21FSEMIColumbia Select Technology ETFScore 23

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FTECAFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

QQHFHCM Defender 100 Index ETF

In short

FTEC Fidelity's tech sleeve runs 0.08% a year and holds about 300 names, tracking an MSCI index that reaches from mega-cap chipmakers down into small-cap software. Cheap beta on the whole US tech stack, not just the giants.

QQH Tech exposure with a built-in escape hatch: QQH follows an in-house index that steps from fully invested to 70/30, then 40/60, then all cash as its trend signal breaks down. Rules-based market timing in an index wrapper, for 0.98%.

Stated mandate

FTEC Seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index.

QQH The Fund seeks to generally track the HCM Defender 100 Index before fees and expenses. It invests at least 80% of net assets in index securities, while the index uses a proprietary trend-based allocation among technology equities and cash or cash equivalents.

Why people hold it

  • FTEC At 0.08%, it ties the cheapest fund in its broad-tech group and undercuts VGT's 0.09%, against a cohort median of 0.40%. On a sector sleeve, that gap compounds quietly.
  • The MSCI USA IMI benchmark covers large, mid and small cap US tech, so the roughly 300 holdings stretch past the mega-cap tier alone.msci.com
  • Trading since 2013 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it sits in the top quartile of its broad technology peer group.
  • QQH The de-risking ladder is written into the prospectus with hard numbers: 3.5% below the BuyLine signal moves the index to 70/30 equity/cash, 6.5% to 40/60, and 12% to all cash or cash equivalents.sec.govhowardcm.com
  • Getting back in has a rule too: the index reinvests in equities only after the reference large-cap index closes above the signal for five straight sessions, so one green day does not flip it.howardcm.com
  • No manager discretion to second-guess. The equity sleeve is the largest, most liquid US technology names, and the shift triggers live in the index methodology, not in a trading desk's judgment.howardcm.com
  • Running since 2019, so the mechanism has been through real tech drawdowns rather than backtests alone.

Worth knowing

  • FTEC Membership follows GICS Information Technology, so several household-name tech businesses classified into other sectors never show up here.msci.com
  • One sector, one story: tech moves harder than the broad market in both directions, and roughly 300 names does not soften that.
  • Distributions arrive quarterly, and a growth-heavy sector index is not built around payouts.
  • QQH At 0.98% it sits above the technology category median (25 funds measured), and far above plain tech trackers like XLK at 0.08% and VGT at 0.09%. The signal is what you are paying up for.
  • The trigger watches a broad US large-cap index, not tech itself, so the move to cash can lag or sidestep a selloff that hits technology alone.sec.gov
  • Defender describes a mechanism, not an outcome: between triggers the fund can be fully invested, and the index is built and maintained by HCM using a model it does not publish.howardcm.com

Full FTEC profile⁠

Full QQH profile⁠

FTEC vs QQH Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FTEC vs QQH Cost

Overpaying QQH vs FTEC

$16,915

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FTEC 0.084%

    $1,773

  • QQH 1.00%

    $18,688

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FTEC 0.084%
  • QQH 1.00%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QQH $18,688FTEC $1,773

Year by year

YearFTECQQHOverpaying
10$154$1,763$1,609
20$603$6,625$6,022
30$1,773$18,688$16,915

Expense ratio

  • 0.08%FTEC, cheaper
  • 1.00%QQH
  • Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.45%

FTEC 2nd cheapest of 23 funds

QQH 23rd cheapest of 23 funds

FTEC vs QQH Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
FTEC 0.41%, better
QQH 0.21%
Payout (12M)
FTEC $1.11
QQH $0.16
Last payment
FTEC $0.33
QQH $0.16
Ex-dividend
FTEC Sep 18, 2026
QQH Dec 16, 2025
Paid on
FTEC Sep 22, 2026
QQH Dec 22, 2025
Frequency
FTEC Quarterly
QQH Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FTECQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll FTEC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.10; Jun 16, 2017 $0.12; Sep 15, 2017 $0.12; Dec 15, 2017 $0.13; Mar 16, 2018 $0.12; Jun 15, 2018 $0.14; Sep 21, 2018 $0.14; Dec 21, 2018 $0.19; Mar 15, 2019 $0.18; Jun 21, 2019 $0.19; Sep 20, 2019 $0.19; Dec 20, 2019 $0.19; Mar 20, 2020 $0.28; Jun 19, 2020 $0.20; Sep 18, 2020 $0.19; Dec 18, 2020 $0.20; Mar 19, 2021 $0.20; Jun 18, 2021 $0.20; Sep 17, 2021 $0.20; Dec 17, 2021 $0.26; Mar 18, 2022 $0.21; Jun 17, 2022 $0.22; Sep 16, 2022 $0.22; Dec 16, 2022 $0.23; Mar 17, 2023 $0.23; Jun 16, 2023 $0.22; Sep 15, 2023 $0.22; Dec 15, 2023 $0.43; Mar 15, 2024 $0.24; Jun 21, 2024 $0.23; Sep 20, 2024 $0.23; Dec 20, 2024 $0.21; Mar 21, 2025 $0.23; Jun 20, 2025 $0.23; Sep 19, 2025 $0.23; Dec 19, 2025 $0.27; Mar 20, 2026 $0.22; Jun 18, 2026 $0.29; Sep 18, 2026 $0.33. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
QQHAnnual · 4 paymentsAll QQH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 13, 2019 $0.06; Dec 15, 2023 $0.14; Dec 16, 2024 $0.16; Dec 16, 2025 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

FTEC vs QQH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FTEC
  • QQH
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: QQH −41.9% · Dec 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FTEC 22.3%QQH 20.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FTEC 1.19, betterQQH 0.88
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FTEC −35.0%, betterQQH −41.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FTEC 1.35QQH 1.37

FTEC and QQH in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FTECAvsXLKA

    Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF · State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QQHFvsXLKA

    HCM Defender 100 Index ETF · State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTECAvsVGTA

    Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF · Vanguard Information Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QQHFvsVGTA

    HCM Defender 100 Index ETF · Vanguard Information Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTECAvsRSPTB

    Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QQHFvsRSPTB

    HCM Defender 100 Index ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.