FTEC ranks 2nd and QQH 20th of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.
FTEC vs QQH
FTEC −0.92pt a year
0.08%1.00%
FTEC 3.9×the volume
275K70.9K
FTEC +8.9pt
+16.8%+7.9%
FTEC vs QQH Performance
+117.0%+46.0%
- FTEC 0.08%, better
- QQH 1.00%
- FTEC $22.2B
- QQH $713M
- FTEC +15.4%, better
- QQH −2.1%
- FTEC 0.41%, better
- QQH 0.21%
- FTEC 290
- QQH 97
- FTEC 275K sh, better
- QQH 70.9K sh
- FTEC $279.07
- QQH $80.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTEC | QQH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | F0 |
| Mission | A98 | |
| Risk | B60Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | A88Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | D38Higher | D33 |
| Durability | A73Higher | D36 |
Rank among Technology (Broad) funds
Same Category. FTEC and QQH are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTECA
QQHF
In short
FTEC Fidelity's tech sleeve runs 0.08% a year and holds about 300 names, tracking an MSCI index that reaches from mega-cap chipmakers down into small-cap software. Cheap beta on the whole US tech stack, not just the giants.
QQH Tech exposure with a built-in escape hatch: QQH follows an in-house index that steps from fully invested to 70/30, then 40/60, then all cash as its trend signal breaks down. Rules-based market timing in an index wrapper, for 0.98%.
Stated mandate
FTEC Seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index.
QQH The Fund seeks to generally track the HCM Defender 100 Index before fees and expenses. It invests at least 80% of net assets in index securities, while the index uses a proprietary trend-based allocation among technology equities and cash or cash equivalents.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTEC vs QQH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTEC vs QQH Cost
Overpaying QQH vs FTEC
$16,915
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTEC 0.084%
$1,773
QQH 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTEC | QQH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $1,763 | $1,609 |
| 20 | $603 | $6,625 | $6,022 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $18,688 | $16,915 |
- 0.08%FTEC, cheaper
- 1.00%QQH
- Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
- Median 0.45%
FTEC 2nd cheapest of 23 funds
QQH 23rd cheapest of 23 funds
FTEC vs QQH Dividends
- FTEC 0.41%, better
- QQH 0.21%
- FTEC $1.11
- QQH $0.16
- FTEC $0.33
- QQH $0.16
- FTEC Sep 18, 2026
- QQH Dec 16, 2025
- FTEC Sep 22, 2026
- QQH Dec 22, 2025
- FTEC Quarterly
- QQH Annual
Distribution history
FTEC vs QQH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTEC
- QQH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTEC 22.3%QQH 20.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FTEC 1.19, betterQQH 0.88
- Worst fall
- FTEC −35.0%, betterQQH −41.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FTEC 1.35QQH 1.37
FTEC and QQH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

