Skip to content

QQH vs XLK

HCM Defender 100 Index ETF

QQHFNYSE Arca

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

XLKANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XLK −0.92pt a year

QQH1.00%XLK0.08%

Avg volume · 30D

XLK 116.8×the volume

QQH70.9KXLK8.28M

5Y return · a year

XLK +9.7pt

QQH+8.5%XLK+18.2%

QQH vs XLK Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+50.6%QQH+130.6%XLK

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. QQH +50.6%. XLK +130.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%100%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QQH 1.00%
XLK 0.08%, better
Fund size
QQH $713M
XLK $125B
1Y total return
QQH −0.2%
XLK +20.0%, better
Yield (12M)
QQH 0.20%
XLK 0.47%, better
Holdings
QQH 97
XLK 78
Avg volume (30D)
QQH 70.9K sh
XLK 8.28M sh, better
NAV per share
QQH $80.59
XLK $188.72
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QQH: Cost 0, Risk 50, Mission 98, Tradability 40, Holdings 32, Durability 36. XLK: Cost 98, Risk 61, Mission 76, Tradability 98, Holdings 41, Durability 82.
Pillar letters and Scores for QQH, XLK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQQHXLK
Cost30% weightF0A98Higher
Mission25% weightA98HigherA76
Risk15% weightC50B61Higher
Tradability15% weightC40A98Higher
Holdings10% weightD32C41Higher
Durability5% weightD36A82Higher

Rank among Technology (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QQH and XLK are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Technology (Broad)⁠

Category · 23 funds
See all 23 ›

XLK ranks 1st and QQH 20th of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLKState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2AFTECFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 19DGTEKGoldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETFScore 28
  4. Rank 20FQQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETFScore 24
  5. Rank 21FSEMIColumbia Select Technology ETFScore 23

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QQHFHCM Defender 100 Index ETF

XLKAState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

In short

QQH Tech exposure with a built-in escape hatch: QQH follows an in-house index that steps from fully invested to 70/30, then 40/60, then all cash as its trend signal breaks down. Rules-based market timing in an index wrapper, for 0.98%.

XLK A 1998 original: XLK owns the technology slice of the S&P 500, about 70 names, for eight basis points. Big, heavily traded, and top-heavy by design, with quarterly caps the only brake on the giants at the top.

Stated mandate

QQH The Fund seeks to generally track the HCM Defender 100 Index before fees and expenses. It invests at least 80% of net assets in index securities, while the index uses a proprietary trend-based allocation among technology equities and cash or cash equivalents.

XLK The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Technology Select Sector Index before expenses.

Why people hold it

  • QQH The de-risking ladder is written into the prospectus with hard numbers: 3.5% below the BuyLine signal moves the index to 70/30 equity/cash, 6.5% to 40/60, and 12% to all cash or cash equivalents.sec.govhowardcm.com
  • Getting back in has a rule too: the index reinvests in equities only after the reference large-cap index closes above the signal for five straight sessions, so one green day does not flip it.howardcm.com
  • No manager discretion to second-guess. The equity sleeve is the largest, most liquid US technology names, and the shift triggers live in the index methodology, not in a trading desk's judgment.howardcm.com
  • Running since 2019, so the mechanism has been through real tech drawdowns rather than backtests alone.
  • XLK Costs 0.08% a year against a roughly 0.40% median for broad tech funds, tying FTEC as the cheapest of the category's top-rated names and undercutting VGT's 0.09%.
  • One of the largest and most actively traded funds in the tech aisle, so entering or exiting rarely means fighting the order book.
  • Running since December 1998 and dead simple: the tech sector of the S&P 500, spanning software, semiconductors, hardware, communications equipment and IT services. Pays quarterly.ssga.com

Worth knowing

  • QQH At 0.98% it sits above the technology category median (25 funds measured), and far above plain tech trackers like XLK at 0.08% and VGT at 0.09%. The signal is what you are paying up for.
  • The trigger watches a broad US large-cap index, not tech itself, so the move to cash can lag or sidestep a selloff that hits technology alone.sec.gov
  • Defender describes a mechanism, not an outcome: between triggers the fund can be fully invested, and the index is built and maintained by HCM using a model it does not publish.howardcm.com
  • XLK Top-heavy by construction. About 70 stocks, and the index only trims its biggest weights at quarterly rebalances to stay inside fund diversification limits.spglobal.com
  • The universe is S&P 500 tech only. Smaller tech companies outside the big index are out, and the Select Sector funds split the S&P 500 up, so some familiar names sit in other sector funds.ssga.com
  • It is one sector with no ballast from the rest of the market, so a tech drawdown lands here in full.

Full QQH profile⁠

Full XLK profile⁠

QQH vs XLK Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QQH vs XLK Cost

Overpaying QQH vs XLK

$16,999

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QQH 1.00%

    $18,688

  • XLK 0.08%

    $1,689

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QQH 1.00%
  • XLK 0.08%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QQH $18,688XLK $1,689

Year by year

YearQQHXLKOverpaying
10$1,763$147$1,616
20$6,625$575$6,050
30$18,688$1,689$16,999

Expense ratio

  • 1.00%QQH
  • 0.08%XLK, cheaper
  • Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.45%

XLK cheapest of 23 funds

QQH 23rd cheapest of 23 funds

QQH vs XLK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QQH 0.20%
XLK 0.47%, better
Payout (12M)
QQH $0.16
XLK $0.83
Last payment
QQH $0.16
XLK $0.22
Ex-dividend
QQH Dec 16, 2025
XLK Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
QQH Dec 22, 2025
XLK Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
QQH Annual
XLK Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

QQHAnnual · 4 paymentsAll QQH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 13, 2019 $0.06; Dec 15, 2023 $0.14; Dec 16, 2024 $0.16; Dec 16, 2025 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
XLKQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll XLK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.10; Jun 16, 2017 $0.11; Sep 15, 2017 $0.10; Dec 15, 2017 $0.12; Mar 16, 2018 $0.11; Jun 15, 2018 $0.13; Sep 21, 2018 $0.13; Dec 21, 2018 $0.13; Mar 15, 2019 $0.12; Jun 21, 2019 $0.14; Sep 20, 2019 $0.13; Dec 20, 2019 $0.15; Mar 23, 2020 $0.19; Jun 22, 2020 $0.14; Sep 21, 2020 $0.12; Dec 21, 2020 $0.15; Mar 22, 2021 $0.14; Jun 21, 2021 $0.13; Sep 20, 2021 $0.14; Dec 20, 2021 $0.16; Mar 21, 2022 $0.14; Jun 21, 2022 $0.16; Sep 19, 2022 $0.16; Dec 19, 2022 $0.18; Mar 20, 2023 $0.16; Jun 20, 2023 $0.18; Sep 18, 2023 $0.18; Dec 18, 2023 $0.21; Mar 18, 2024 $0.17; Jun 24, 2024 $0.20; Sep 23, 2024 $0.20; Dec 23, 2024 $0.19; Mar 24, 2025 $0.19; Jun 23, 2025 $0.20; Sep 22, 2025 $0.18; Dec 22, 2025 $0.22; Mar 23, 2026 $0.17; Jun 22, 2026 $0.23; Sep 21, 2026 $0.22. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

QQH vs XLK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • QQH
  • XLK
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: QQH −41.9% · Dec 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QQH 20.8%, betterXLK 23.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QQH 0.88XLK 1.07, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QQH −41.9%XLK −33.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QQH 1.37XLK 1.35

QQH and XLK in the news

Popular comparisons

  • QQHFvsFTECA

    HCM Defender 100 Index ETF · Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLKAvsFTECA

    State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF · Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QQHFvsVGTA

    HCM Defender 100 Index ETF · Vanguard Information Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLKAvsVGTA

    State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF · Vanguard Information Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QQHFvsRSPTB

    HCM Defender 100 Index ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLKAvsRSPTB

    State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.