VGT ranks 3rd and QQH 20th of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.
QQH vs VGT
VGT −0.91pt a year
1.00%0.09%
VGT 59.6×the volume
70.9K4.23M
VGT +8.6pt
+7.9%+16.5%
QQH vs VGT Performance
+46.0%+114.9%
- QQH 1.00%
- VGT 0.09%, better
- QQH $713M
- VGT $178B
- QQH −2.1%
- VGT +15.3%, better
- QQH 0.21%
- VGT 0.42%, better
- QQH 97
- VGT 324
- QQH 70.9K sh
- VGT 4.23M sh, better
- QQH $80.59
- VGT $116.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQH | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A92Higher |
| Mission | A98Higher | A84 |
| Risk | C50 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | B57Higher |
| Holdings | D33 | C41Higher |
| Durability | D36 | A93Higher |
Rank among Technology (Broad) funds
Same Category. QQH and VGT are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQHF
VGTA
In short
QQH Tech exposure with a built-in escape hatch: QQH follows an in-house index that steps from fully invested to 70/30, then 40/60, then all cash as its trend signal breaks down. Rules-based market timing in an index wrapper, for 0.98%.
VGT Vanguard's technology sleeve, indexed since 2004: roughly 300 US tech stocks running from megacap giants down to small caps, for 0.09% a year. Broad coverage of the sector rather than just its household names.
Stated mandate
QQH The Fund seeks to generally track the HCM Defender 100 Index before fees and expenses. It invests at least 80% of net assets in index securities, while the index uses a proprietary trend-based allocation among technology equities and cash or cash equivalents.
VGT The fund seeks to track an index measuring the investment return of information technology stocks. It uses an indexing approach for large-, mid-, and small-capitalization U.S. technology companies and normally invests at least 80% of assets in target-index stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQH vs VGT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQH vs VGT Cost
Overpaying QQH vs VGT
$16,790
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQH 1.00%
$18,688
VGT 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQH | VGT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $165 | $1,598 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $646 | $5,979 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $1,898 | $16,790 |
- 1.00%QQH
- 0.09%VGT, cheaper
- Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
- Median 0.45%
VGT 3rd cheapest of 23 funds
QQH 23rd cheapest of 23 funds
QQH vs VGT Dividends
- QQH 0.21%
- VGT 0.42%, better
- QQH $0.16
- VGT $0.47
- QQH $0.16
- VGT $0.15
- QQH Dec 16, 2025
- VGT Sep 23, 2026
- QQH Dec 22, 2025
- VGT Sep 25, 2026
- QQH Annual
- VGT Quarterly
Distribution history
QQH vs VGT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QQH
- VGT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQH 20.8%, betterVGT 22.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQH 0.88VGT 1.19, better
- Worst fall
- QQH −41.9%VGT −35.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- QQH 1.37VGT 1.35
QQH and VGT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





