FTEC ranks 2nd of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.
FTEC vs SPYM
SPYM −0.06pt a year
0.08%0.02%
SPYM 44.0×the volume
275K12.1M
FTEC +8.7pt
+24.4%+15.7%
FTEC vs SPYM Performance
+138.4%+80.7%
- FTEC 0.08%
- SPYM 0.02%, better
- FTEC $22.2B
- SPYM $183B
- FTEC +25.0%, better
- SPYM +13.7%
- FTEC 0.38%
- SPYM 1.00%, better
- FTEC 292
- SPYM 508
- FTEC 275K sh
- SPYM 12.1M sh, better
- FTEC $294.64
- SPYM $90.06
ETF.net Grade
No winner tick: these funds sit in different Categories, and each Score ranks a fund only inside its own Category.
| Pillar | FTEC | SPYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98 | A99 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B55 | C51 |
| Tradability | A88 | A72 |
| Holdings | D38 | B57 |
| Durability | A73 | A79 |
Where each fund ranks
Different Categories. Their Grades do not compare head to head.
SPYM ranks 1st of 14 funds in the S&P 500 Category.
Our read on each fund
FTECA
SPYMA
In short
FTEC Fidelity's tech sleeve runs 0.08% a year and holds about 300 names, tracking an MSCI index that reaches from mega-cap chipmakers down into small-cap software. Cheap beta on the whole US tech stack, not just the giants.
SPYM State Street's budget-priced S&P 500 tracker: the same 500 large caps as its famous sibling, for 0.02% a year, the lowest fee in its S&P 500 peer group. Running since 2005 and now one of the category's giants.
Stated mandate
FTEC Seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index.
SPYM The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P 500 Index before fees and expenses, providing broad exposure to U.S. large-cap equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTEC vs SPYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTEC vs SPYM Cost
Overpaying FTEC vs SPYM
$1,347
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTEC 0.084%
$1,773
SPYM 0.02%
$426
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTEC | SPYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $37 | $117 |
| 20 | $603 | $144 | $459 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $426 | $1,347 |
- 0.08%FTEC
- 0.02%SPYM, cheaper
Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.Different Categories, so each fee sits in its own Category’s range.
FTEC among 23 Technology (Broad) funds
- Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
- Median 0.45%
FTEC 2nd cheapest of 23 funds
SPYM among 14 S&P 500 funds
- Middle half of S&P 500 funds
- Median 0.09%
SPYM cheapest of 14 funds
FTEC vs SPYM Dividends
- FTEC 0.38%
- SPYM 1.00%, better
- FTEC $1.11
- SPYM $0.91
- FTEC $0.33
- SPYM $0.24
- FTEC Sep 18, 2026
- SPYM Sep 11, 2026
- FTEC Sep 22, 2026
- SPYM Sep 15, 2026
- FTEC Quarterly
- SPYM Quarterly
Distribution history
FTEC vs SPYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTEC
- SPYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTEC 21.7%SPYM 12.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FTEC 1.31SPYM 1.37, better
- Worst fall
- FTEC −35.0%SPYM −24.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FTEC 1.35SPYM 1.01
FTEC and SPYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.02% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.02% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.
- 0.02% · 0.08%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.





