Skip to content

FTEC vs SPYM

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

FTECANYSE Arca

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF

SPYMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SPYM −0.06pt a year

FTEC0.08%SPYM0.02%

Avg volume · 30D

SPYM 44.0×the volume

FTEC275KSPYM12.1M

10Y return · a year

FTEC +8.7pt

FTEC+24.4%SPYM+15.7%

FTEC vs SPYM Performance

Oct 28, 2021 – Oct 28, 2026

+138.4%FTEC+80.7%SPYM

Oct 28, 2021 to Oct 28, 2026. FTEC +138.4%. SPYM +80.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%50%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FTEC 0.08%
SPYM 0.02%, better
Fund size
FTEC $22.2B
SPYM $183B
1Y total return
FTEC +25.0%, better
SPYM +13.7%
Yield (12M)
FTEC 0.38%
SPYM 1.00%, better
Holdings
FTEC 292
SPYM 508
Avg volume (30D)
FTEC 275K sh
SPYM 12.1M sh, better
NAV per share
FTEC $294.64
SPYM $90.06
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FTEC: Cost 98, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings 38, Durability 73. SPYM: Cost 99, Risk 51, Mission 100, Tradability 72, Holdings 57, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for FTEC, SPYM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFTECSPYM
Cost30% weightA98A99
Mission25% weightNot scoredA100
Risk15% weightB55C51
Tradability15% weightA88A72
Holdings10% weightD38B57
Durability5% weightA73A79

Where each fund ranks

Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.

Different Categories. Their Grades do not compare head to head.

Technology (Broad)⁠

Category · 23 funds
See all 23 ›

FTEC ranks 2nd of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLKState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 2AFTECFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 3AVGTVanguard Information Technology ETFScore 70

S&P 500⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

SPYM ranks 1st of 14 funds in the S&P 500 Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYMState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2AIVViShares Core S&P 500 ETFScore 79

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FTECAFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

SPYMAState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF

In short

FTEC Fidelity's tech sleeve runs 0.08% a year and holds about 300 names, tracking an MSCI index that reaches from mega-cap chipmakers down into small-cap software. Cheap beta on the whole US tech stack, not just the giants.

SPYM State Street's budget-priced S&P 500 tracker: the same 500 large caps as its famous sibling, for 0.02% a year, the lowest fee in its S&P 500 peer group. Running since 2005 and now one of the category's giants.

Stated mandate

FTEC Seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index.

SPYM The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P 500 Index before fees and expenses, providing broad exposure to U.S. large-cap equities.

Why people hold it

  • FTEC At 0.08%, it ties the cheapest fund in its broad-tech group and undercuts VGT's 0.09%, against a cohort median of 0.40%. On a sector sleeve, that gap compounds quietly.
  • The MSCI USA IMI benchmark covers large, mid and small cap US tech, so the roughly 300 holdings stretch past the mega-cap tier alone.msci.com
  • Trading since 2013 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it sits in the top quartile of its broad technology peer group.
  • SPYM 0.02% a year, the cheapest fee in its S&P 500 cohort, against a 0.15% median for the group. Two dollars a year per $10,000 invested.
  • Same S&P 500 index as State Street's flagship SPY (0.09%), for a fraction of the fee, and a basis point under VOO and IVV.
  • Tracks the index tightly: gaps between fund and benchmark are among the smallest in its peer group, which is the whole job of an index wrapper.
  • Live since 2005, now one of the largest and most heavily traded funds in the category. Distributions land quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • FTEC Membership follows GICS Information Technology, so several household-name tech businesses classified into other sectors never show up here.msci.com
  • One sector, one story: tech moves harder than the broad market in both directions, and roughly 300 names does not soften that.
  • Distributions arrive quarterly, and a growth-heavy sector index is not built around payouts.
  • SPYM The S&P 500 is cap-weighted, so the biggest US companies drive most of the move. Equal-weight takes on the same index (RSP) spread that bet differently.
  • About 500 US large caps and nothing else: no mid caps, no small caps, no international.
  • The fee edge over VOO and IVV is one basis point. Same index, so trading costs and platform access matter as much as the sticker fee.

Full FTEC profile⁠

Full SPYM profile⁠

FTEC vs SPYM Holdings

Holdings as of Oct 29, 2026 for FTEC and Oct 27, 2026 for SPYM

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FTEC vs SPYM Cost

Overpaying FTEC vs SPYM

$1,347

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FTEC 0.084%

    $1,773

  • SPYM 0.02%

    $426

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FTEC 0.084%
  • SPYM 0.02%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$500$1K$1.5K$2K051015202530FTEC $1,773SPYM $426

Year by year

YearFTECSPYMOverpaying
10$154$37$117
20$603$144$459
30$1,773$426$1,347

Expense ratio

  • 0.08%FTEC
  • 0.02%SPYM, cheaper

Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.Different Categories, so each fee sits in its own Category’s range.

FTEC among 23 Technology (Broad) funds

  • Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.45%

FTEC 2nd cheapest of 23 funds

SPYM among 14 S&P 500 funds

  • Middle half of S&P 500 funds
  • Median 0.09%

SPYM cheapest of 14 funds

FTEC vs SPYM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 28, 2026
Yield (12M)
FTEC 0.38%
SPYM 1.00%, better
Payout (12M)
FTEC $1.11
SPYM $0.91
Last payment
FTEC $0.33
SPYM $0.24
Ex-dividend
FTEC Sep 18, 2026
SPYM Sep 11, 2026
Paid on
FTEC Sep 22, 2026
SPYM Sep 15, 2026
Frequency
FTEC Quarterly
SPYM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FTECQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll FTEC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.10; Jun 16, 2017 $0.12; Sep 15, 2017 $0.12; Dec 15, 2017 $0.13; Mar 16, 2018 $0.12; Jun 15, 2018 $0.14; Sep 21, 2018 $0.14; Dec 21, 2018 $0.19; Mar 15, 2019 $0.18; Jun 21, 2019 $0.19; Sep 20, 2019 $0.19; Dec 20, 2019 $0.19; Mar 20, 2020 $0.28; Jun 19, 2020 $0.20; Sep 18, 2020 $0.19; Dec 18, 2020 $0.20; Mar 19, 2021 $0.20; Jun 18, 2021 $0.20; Sep 17, 2021 $0.20; Dec 17, 2021 $0.26; Mar 18, 2022 $0.21; Jun 17, 2022 $0.22; Sep 16, 2022 $0.22; Dec 16, 2022 $0.23; Mar 17, 2023 $0.23; Jun 16, 2023 $0.22; Sep 15, 2023 $0.22; Dec 15, 2023 $0.43; Mar 15, 2024 $0.24; Jun 21, 2024 $0.23; Sep 20, 2024 $0.23; Dec 20, 2024 $0.21; Mar 21, 2025 $0.23; Jun 20, 2025 $0.23; Sep 19, 2025 $0.23; Dec 19, 2025 $0.27; Mar 20, 2026 $0.22; Jun 18, 2026 $0.29; Sep 18, 2026 $0.33. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
SPYMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll SPYM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.12; Jun 16, 2017 $0.13; Sep 15, 2017 $0.14; Dec 15, 2017 $0.16; Mar 16, 2018 $0.14; Jun 15, 2018 $0.15; Sep 21, 2018 $0.19; Dec 21, 2018 $0.17; Mar 15, 2019 $0.15; Jun 21, 2019 $0.17; Sep 20, 2019 $0.17; Dec 20, 2019 $0.19; Mar 23, 2020 $0.18; Jun 22, 2020 $0.17; Sep 21, 2020 $0.15; Dec 21, 2020 $0.18; Mar 22, 2021 $0.17; Jun 21, 2021 $0.17; Sep 20, 2021 $0.15; Dec 20, 2021 $0.20; Mar 21, 2022 $0.17; Jun 21, 2022 $0.19; Sep 19, 2022 $0.19; Dec 19, 2022 $0.21; Mar 20, 2023 $0.18; Jun 20, 2023 $0.20; Sep 18, 2023 $0.20; Dec 18, 2023 $0.22; Mar 18, 2024 $0.20; Jun 24, 2024 $0.22; Sep 23, 2024 $0.22; Dec 27, 2024 $0.24; Mar 28, 2025 $0.22; Jun 27, 2025 $0.21; Sep 26, 2025 $0.24; Dec 26, 2025 $0.24; Mar 13, 2026 $0.19; Jun 12, 2026 $0.24; Sep 11, 2026 $0.24. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

FTEC vs SPYM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FTEC
  • SPYM
Oct 28, 2021 to Oct 28, 2026. Worst fall: FTEC −35.0% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FTEC 21.7%SPYM 12.4%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FTEC 1.31SPYM 1.37, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FTEC −35.0%SPYM −24.5%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FTEC 1.35SPYM 1.01

FTEC and SPYM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FTECAvsXLKA

    Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF · State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPYMAvsIVVA

    State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF · iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.02% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTECAvsVGTA

    Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF · Vanguard Information Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPYMAvsVOOA

    State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF · Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.02% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTECAvsIVVA

    Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF · iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.03%
    Category
    Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.
  • SPYMAvsXLKA

    State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF · State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.02% · 0.08%
    Category
    Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.