FTEC ranks 2nd of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.
FTEC vs IVV
IVV −0.05pt a year
0.08%0.03%
IVV 23.2×the volume
275K6.39M
FTEC +8.7pt
+24.4%+15.7%
FTEC vs IVV Performance
+138.4%+80.7%
- FTEC 0.08%
- IVV 0.03%, better
- FTEC $22.2B
- IVV $889B
- FTEC +25.0%, better
- IVV +13.7%
- FTEC 0.38%
- IVV 1.08%, better
- FTEC 292
- IVV 507
- FTEC 275K sh
- IVV 6.39M sh, better
- FTEC $294.64
- IVV $775.30
ETF.net Grade
No winner tick: these funds sit in different Categories, and each Score ranks a fund only inside its own Category.
| Pillar | FTEC | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98 | A84 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B55 | C51 |
| Tradability | A88 | A80 |
| Holdings | D38 | B55 |
| Durability | A73 | A86 |
Where each fund ranks
Different Categories. Their Grades do not compare head to head.
IVV ranks 2nd of 14 funds in the S&P 500 Category.
Our read on each fund
FTECA
IVVA
In short
FTEC Fidelity's tech sleeve runs 0.08% a year and holds about 300 names, tracking an MSCI index that reaches from mega-cap chipmakers down into small-cap software. Cheap beta on the whole US tech stack, not just the giants.
IVV The 2000-vintage iShares take on the S&P 500, now a $100B-plus cornerstone holding: roughly 500 large US companies, 0.03% a year, and tracking that stays tight to the index.
Stated mandate
FTEC Seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index.
IVV The fund seeks to track the investment results of an index made up of large-capitalization U.S. equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTEC vs IVV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTEC vs IVV Cost
Overpaying FTEC vs IVV
$1,135
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTEC 0.084%
$1,773
IVV 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTEC | IVV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $55 | $99 |
| 20 | $603 | $216 | $387 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $638 | $1,135 |
- 0.08%FTEC
- 0.03%IVV, cheaper
Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.Different Categories, so each fee sits in its own Category’s range.
FTEC among 23 Technology (Broad) funds
- Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
- Median 0.45%
FTEC 2nd cheapest of 23 funds
IVV among 14 S&P 500 funds
- Middle half of S&P 500 funds
- Median 0.09%
IVV 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
FTEC vs IVV Dividends
- FTEC 0.38%
- IVV 1.08%, better
- FTEC $1.11
- IVV $8.40
- FTEC $0.33
- IVV $2.20
- FTEC Sep 18, 2026
- IVV Sep 15, 2026
- FTEC Sep 22, 2026
- IVV Sep 18, 2026
- FTEC Quarterly
- IVV Quarterly
Distribution history
FTEC vs IVV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTEC
- IVV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTEC 21.7%IVV 12.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FTEC 1.31IVV 1.37, better
- Worst fall
- FTEC −35.0%IVV −24.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FTEC 1.35IVV 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.02%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.





