XHLF ranks 4th and FTSM 36th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
FTSM vs XHLF
XHLF −0.26pt a year
0.29%0.03%
FTSM 2.3×the volume
720K309K
FTSM +0.3pt
+4.7%+4.4%
FTSM vs XHLF Performance
+3.6%+3.6%
- FTSM 0.29%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- FTSM $6.8B
- XHLF $2.03B
- FTSM +3.6%
- XHLF +3.6%
- FTSM 4.45%, better
- XHLF 3.75%
- FTSM 742
- XHLF 29
- FTSM 720K sh, better
- XHLF 309K sh
- FTSM $59.60
- XHLF $50.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTSM | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C49Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A76 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | A93Higher | D35 |
| Durability | A88Higher | B59 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. FTSM and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTSMB
XHLFA
In short
FTSM A 2014-vintage active take on the cash-parking shelf: First Trust's managers roam short-duration investment-grade debt across sectors instead of tracking an index, chasing current income while preserving capital and keeping daily liquidity.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
FTSM The fund seeks current income while preserving capital and maintaining daily liquidity. It is actively managed and invests in short-duration, primarily U.S.-dollar-denominated, investment-grade securities across a broad range of asset classes.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTSM vs XHLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTSM vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying FTSM vs XHLF
$5,314
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTSM 0.29%
$5,952
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTSM | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $55 | $472 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $216 | $1,828 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $638 | $5,314 |
- 0.29%FTSM
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
FTSM 68th cheapest of 78 funds
FTSM vs XHLF Dividends
- FTSM 4.45%, better
- XHLF 3.75%
- FTSM $2.65
- XHLF $1.89
- FTSM $0.21
- XHLF $0.15
- FTSM Oct 30, 2026
- XHLF Oct 1, 2026
- FTSM Pays Nov 3, 2026
- XHLF Oct 6, 2026
- FTSM Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
FTSM vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTSM 0.5%XHLF 0.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FTSM 0.29, betterXHLF −0.52
- Worst fall
- FTSM −0.6%XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FTSM 0.05XHLF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.