Skip to content

FV vs PTLC

First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF

FVCNasdaq

Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

PTLCACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PTLC −0.29pt a year

FV0.89%PTLC0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

PTLC 1.4×the volume

FV69.7KPTLC99.6K

10Y return · a year

FV +2.3pt

FV+13.4%PTLC+11.1%

FV vs PTLC Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+57.7%FV+53.4%PTLC

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FV +57.7%. PTLC +53.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FV 0.89%
PTLC 0.60%, better
Fund size
FV $3.91B
PTLC $3.24B
1Y total return
FV +22.0%, better
PTLC +6.4%
Yield (12M)
FV 0.35%
PTLC 1.00%, better
Holdings
FV 6
PTLC 505
Avg volume (30D)
FV 69.7K sh
PTLC 99.6K sh, better
NAV per share
FV $75.06
PTLC $59.01
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FV: Cost 21, Risk 41, Mission 89, Tradability 78, Holdings 34, Durability 93. PTLC: Cost 71, Risk 65, Mission 78, Tradability 100, Holdings 72, Durability 86.
Pillar letters and Scores for FV, PTLC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFVPTLC
Cost30% weightF21A71Higher
Mission25% weightA89HigherA78
Risk15% weightC41B65Higher
Tradability15% weightA78A100Higher
Holdings10% weightD34A72Higher
Durability5% weightA93HigherA86

Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FV and PTLC are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 20 ›

PTLC ranks 2nd and FV 13th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AWAMAWisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average FundScore 80
  2. Rank 2APTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3AONOFGlobal X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 12CPTEUPacer Trendpilot European Index ETFScore 46
  5. Rank 13CFVFirst Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETFScore 43
  6. Rank 14CTRNDPacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FVCFirst Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF

PTLCAPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

In short

FV Sector rotation in one ticker: FV holds five First Trust sector ETFs, equally weighted, chosen by Dorsey Wright relative strength and re-checked twice a month. Momentum investing on autopilot since 2014.

PTLC Most index funds ride out every drawdown. PTLC tracks an index with an exit ramp: a rules-based trend signal that shifts its large-cap exposure toward 3-month Treasury bills and back, with no manager judgment in the loop.

Stated mandate

FV The ETF seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index. The index uses relative strength to select five First Trust sector and industry ETFs from its universe, reviews selections twice monthly, and equally weights the positions.

PTLC The Fund seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap Index. That index uses a rules-based trend-following approach that alternates exposure between equities and 3-Month US Treasury bills.

Why people hold it

  • FV One ticker does the rotating: relative strength picks five sector and industry ETFs, weights them equally, and reviews the lineup twice a month. No spreadsheet, no manual trades.ftportfolios.com
  • The strategy is stated on the tin. Dorsey Wright's relative strength rules drive every pick, and momentum is advertised rather than buried in the fine print.ftportfolios.com
  • Live since March 2014, now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades in reasonable size and distributes quarterly. Long track record for a rules-based rotation strategy.
  • PTLC The switch is mechanical. A rules-based trend signal alternates exposure between US large-cap equities and 3-month Treasury bills, so nobody is making a gut call mid-panic.paceretfs.com
  • Underneath the signal sits plain large-cap America: roughly 500 stocks benchmarked to the S&P 500, not a niche factor slice.paceretfs.com
  • Trading since 2015 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, so the rules have run through live markets, not just backtests.
  • Among the index-tracking funds we cover, it lands in the upper half, and it follows its own index closely.

Worth knowing

  • FV At 0.89% a year, it sits well above the median for index-tracking funds in its peer group, and a fund-of-funds build means costs sit at two levels.
  • Five equal-weighted sector sleeves is a concentrated book, and whole sectors can enter or exit twice a month, so high turnover is part of the design.ftportfolios.com
  • The selection menu is First Trust's own sector and industry ETFs, not the full universe of funds, so results ride on that lineup.
  • PTLC 0.60% a year is real money next to vanilla large-cap trackers like SCHK (0.03%) or VOOV (0.07%). The trend rules are what the extra buys.
  • Trend signals read past prices. Moves into T-bills, or back into stocks, arrive after a market shift is already underway rather than ahead of it.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, so it isn't structured as a steady income drip.

Full FV profile⁠

Full PTLC profile⁠

FV vs PTLC Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FV vs PTLC Cost

Overpaying FV vs PTLC

$5,055

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FV 0.89%

    $16,872

  • PTLC 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FV 0.89%
  • PTLC 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FV $16,872PTLC $11,817

Year by year

YearFVPTLCOverpaying
10$1,576$1,076$500
20$5,953$4,116$1,837
30$16,872$11,817$5,055

Expense ratio

  • 0.89%FV
  • 0.60%PTLC, cheaper
  • Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
  • Median 0.67%

PTLC 6th cheapest of 20 funds

FV 16th cheapest of 20 funds

FV vs PTLC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FV 0.35%
PTLC 1.00%, better
Payout (12M)
FV $0.26
PTLC $0.59
Last payment
FV $0.08
PTLC $0.59
Ex-dividend
FV Jun 25, 2026
PTLC Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
FV Jun 30, 2026
PTLC Jan 5, 2026
Frequency
FV Quarterly
PTLC Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FVQuarterly · 32 paymentsAll FV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 32 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 22, 2017 $0.02; Sep 21, 2017 $0.05; Dec 21, 2017 $0.11; Mar 22, 2018 $0.0015; Jun 21, 2018 $0.02; Sep 14, 2018 $0.02; Dec 18, 2018 $0.0008; Mar 21, 2019 $0.01; Jun 14, 2019 $0.0088; Sep 25, 2019 $0.07; Dec 13, 2019 $0.08; Mar 26, 2020 $0.03; Sep 23, 2021 $0.02; Dec 23, 2021 $0.03; Mar 25, 2022 $0.09; Jun 24, 2022 $0.17; Sep 23, 2022 $0.15; Dec 23, 2022 $0.23; Mar 24, 2023 $0.14; Jun 27, 2023 $0.05; Sep 22, 2023 $0.0096; Dec 22, 2023 $0.05; Mar 21, 2024 $0.007; Jun 27, 2024 $0.02; Sep 26, 2024 $0.02; Dec 13, 2024 $0.04; Mar 27, 2025 $0.06; Jun 26, 2025 $0.10; Sep 25, 2025 $0.10; Dec 12, 2025 $0.14; Mar 26, 2026 $0.05; Jun 25, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
PTLCAnnual · 9 paymentsAll PTLC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2017 $0.28; Dec 24, 2018 $0.29; Dec 24, 2019 $0.37; Dec 21, 2020 $0.35; Dec 23, 2021 $0.31; Dec 22, 2022 $0.47; Dec 27, 2023 $0.51; Dec 27, 2024 $0.36; Dec 30, 2025 $0.59. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

FV vs PTLC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FV
  • PTLC
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FV −23.1% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FV 17.5%PTLC 11.7%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FV 0.97, betterPTLC 0.95
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FV −23.1%PTLC −15.2%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FV 1.24PTLC 0.87

FV and PTLC in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FVCvsWAMAA

    First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF · WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTLCAvsWAMAA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FVCvsONOFA

    First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF · Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTLCAvsONOFA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FVCvsPTMCA

    First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTLCAvsPTMCA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.