ONOF ranks 3rd and FV 13th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.
FV vs ONOF
ONOF −0.50pt a year
0.89%0.39%
FV 12.0×the volume
69.7K5.82K
FV +2.1pt
+9.5%+7.4%
FV vs ONOF Performance
+57.7%+42.6%
- FV 0.89%
- ONOF 0.39%, better
- FV $3.91B
- ONOF $140M
- FV +22.0%, better
- ONOF +7.7%
- FV 0.35%
- ONOF 1.22%, better
- FV 6
- ONOF 504
- FV 69.7K sh, better
- ONOF 5.82K sh
- FV $75.06
- ONOF $40.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FV | ONOF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A95Higher |
| Mission | A89 | |
| Risk | C41 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | A78Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | D34 | A76Higher |
| Durability | A93Higher | B56 |
Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
Same Category. FV and ONOF are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FVC
ONOFA
In short
FV Sector rotation in one ticker: FV holds five First Trust sector ETFs, equally weighted, chosen by Dorsey Wright relative strength and re-checked twice a month. Momentum investing on autopilot since 2014.
ONOF The ticker says it out loud: ONOF is an on/off switch. Four technical indicators decide whether it owns a broad basket of U.S. stocks or sits in short-term Treasuries. Rules, not hunches.
Stated mandate
FV The ETF seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index. The index uses relative strength to select five First Trust sector and industry ETFs from its universe, reviews selections twice monthly, and equally weights the positions.
ONOF ONOF seeks to track the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index before fees and expenses. Its four technical indicators shift the Fund between U.S. equities and defensive short-term Treasuries.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FV vs ONOF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FV vs ONOF Cost
Overpaying FV vs ONOF
$8,974
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FV 0.89%
$16,872
ONOF 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FV | ONOF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $705 | $871 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $2,725 | $3,228 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $7,898 | $8,974 |
- 0.89%FV
- 0.39%ONOF, cheaper
- Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
- Median 0.67%
ONOF 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
FV 16th cheapest of 20 funds
FV vs ONOF Dividends
- FV 0.35%
- ONOF 1.22%, better
- FV $0.26
- ONOF $0.49
- FV $0.08
- ONOF $0.16
- FV Jun 25, 2026
- ONOF Jun 29, 2026
- FV Jun 30, 2026
- ONOF Jul 2, 2026
- FV Quarterly
- ONOF Twice a year
Distribution history
FV vs ONOF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FV
- ONOF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FV 17.5%ONOF 12.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FV 0.97, betterONOF 0.82
- Worst fall
- FV −23.1%, betterONOF −26.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FV 1.24ONOF 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.