XLY ranks 1st and FXD 13th of 14 funds in the Consumer Discretionary (Broad) Category.
FXD vs XLY
XLY −0.52pt a year
0.60%0.08%
XLY 677.1×the volume
10.9K7.35M
XLY +4.3pt
+8.7%+13.0%
FXD vs XLY Performance
+16.8%+23.4%
- FXD 0.60%
- XLY 0.08%, better
- FXD $267M
- XLY $22.7B
- FXD +10.6%, better
- XLY +3.4%
- FXD 0.66%
- XLY 0.77%, better
- FXD 111
- XLY 50
- FXD 10.9K sh
- XLY 7.35M sh, better
- FXD $70.33
- XLY $117.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FXD | XLY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F4 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | C54 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | D30 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | A90Higher | C40 |
| Durability | C52 | A79Higher |
Rank among Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
Same Category. FXD and XLY are both graded against the same 14 Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FXDD
XLYA
In short
FXD Most consumer discretionary ETFs buy the sector as it comes. FXD screens it first: First Trust's AlphaDEX rules rank names on growth and value metrics, landing on roughly 120 holdings. A rules-based stock picker in index clothing, running since 2007.
XLY Live since 1998 as one of the original Select Sector SPDRs, XLY bundles the S&P 500's spending-money stocks (cars, couches, burgers, online carts) into one heavily traded ticker at eight basis points.
Stated mandate
FXD The Fund seeks investment results that generally track the price and yield performance of the StrataQuant® Consumer Discretionary Index before fees and expenses.
XLY The fund seeks to track the performance of the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, providing targeted exposure to companies in the consumer discretionary sector.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FXD vs XLY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FXD vs XLY Cost
Overpaying FXD vs XLY
$10,128
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FXD 0.60%
$11,817
XLY 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FXD | XLY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $147 | $929 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $575 | $3,541 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $1,689 | $10,128 |
- 0.60%FXD
- 0.08%XLY, cheaper
- Middle half of Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
- Median 0.35%
XLY cheapest of 14 funds
FXD 13th cheapest of 14 funds
FXD vs XLY Dividends
- FXD 0.66%
- XLY 0.77%, better
- FXD $0.48
- XLY $0.93
- FXD $0.14
- XLY $0.24
- FXD Sep 24, 2026
- XLY Sep 21, 2026
- FXD Sep 30, 2026
- XLY Sep 23, 2026
- FXD Quarterly
- XLY Quarterly
Distribution history
FXD vs XLY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FXD
- XLY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FXD 17.9%XLY 17.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FXD 0.56XLY 0.67, better
- Worst fall
- FXD −33.7%, betterXLY −39.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FXD 1.13XLY 1.21
FXD and XLY in the news



Closing Bell
Stocks higher on narrow tech and consumer rally



Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.