GXC ranks 4th and FXI 12th of 28 funds in the China Category.
FXI vs GXC
GXC −0.14pt a year
0.73%0.59%
FXI 834.2×the volume
19.5M23.4K
GXC +1.2pt
+1.4%+2.6%
FXI vs GXC Performance
−7.2%−18.2%
- FXI 0.73%
- GXC 0.59%, better
- FXI $3.77B
- GXC $421M
- FXI −15.2%, better
- GXC −19.1%
- FXI 2.05%
- GXC 2.46%, better
- FXI 55
- GXC 1539
- FXI 19.5M sh, better
- GXC 23.4K sh
- FXI $32.92
- GXC $80.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FXI | GXC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | A78Higher |
| Mission | B63 | A85Higher |
| Risk | B68Higher | B67 |
| Tradability | A96Higher | B69 |
| Holdings | D38 | A76Higher |
| Durability | A89Higher | A84 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. FXI and GXC are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FXIB
GXCA
In short
FXI The old-guard China trade: since 2004, FXI has held about 50 of the largest Chinese companies listed in Hong Kong, and it is built for heavy, fast trading more than for lowest-cost buy-and-hold.
GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.
Stated mandate
FXI The fund seeks to track an index of large-capitalization Chinese equities traded on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FXI vs GXC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FXI vs GXC Cost
Overpaying FXI vs GXC
$2,498
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FXI 0.73%
$14,133
GXC 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FXI | GXC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,302 | $1,058 | $244 |
| 20 | $4,952 | $4,051 | $901 |
| 30 | $14,133 | $11,635 | $2,498 |
- 0.73%FXI
- 0.59%GXC, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds
FXI 20th cheapest of 28 funds
FXI vs GXC Dividends
- FXI 2.05%
- GXC 2.46%, better
- FXI $0.68
- GXC $1.99
- FXI $0.26
- GXC $0.67
- FXI Jun 15, 2026
- GXC Jun 22, 2026
- FXI Jun 18, 2026
- GXC Jun 26, 2026
- FXI Twice a year
- GXC Twice a year
Distribution history
FXI vs GXC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FXI
- GXC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FXI 21.5%GXC 20.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FXI 0.42, betterGXC 0.27
- Worst fall
- FXI −48.9%GXC −46.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FXI 0.47GXC 0.69
FXI and GXC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.73% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.73% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.73% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





