VGT ranks 3rd and FXL 15th of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.
FXL vs VGT
VGT −0.51pt a year
0.60%0.09%
VGT 32.5×the volume
130K4.23M
VGT +4.2pt
+19.7%+23.9%
FXL vs VGT Performance
+62.6%+122.6%
- FXL 0.60%
- VGT 0.09%, better
- FXL $2.68B
- VGT $178B
- FXL +21.6%, better
- VGT +18.5%
- FXL 0.00%
- VGT 0.40%, better
- FXL 111
- VGT 321
- FXL 130K sh
- VGT 4.23M sh, better
- FXL $213.51
- VGT $116.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FXL | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | A92Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | B56 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | B63Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | C41 |
| Durability | B59 | A93Higher |
Rank among Technology (Broad) funds
Same Category. FXL and VGT are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FXLC
VGTA
In short
FXL A 2007-vintage tech fund that skips the cap-weighted default. Roughly 100 names selected and weighted by the rules of the StrataQuant Technology Index: smart beta before the label caught on.
VGT Vanguard's technology sleeve, indexed since 2004: roughly 300 US tech stocks running from megacap giants down to small caps, for 0.09% a year. Broad coverage of the sector rather than just its household names.
Stated mandate
FXL Seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield, before fees and expenses, of the StrataQuant® Technology equity index.
VGT The fund seeks to track an index measuring the investment return of information technology stocks. It uses an indexing approach for large-, mid-, and small-capitalization U.S. technology companies and normally invests at least 80% of assets in target-index stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FXL vs VGT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FXL vs VGT Cost
Overpaying FXL vs VGT
$9,919
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FXL 0.60%
$11,817
VGT 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FXL | VGT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $165 | $911 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $646 | $3,470 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $1,898 | $9,919 |
- 0.60%FXL
- 0.09%VGT, cheaper
- Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
- Median 0.45%
VGT 3rd cheapest of 23 funds
FXL 16th cheapest of 23 funds
FXL vs VGT Dividends
- FXL 0.00%
- VGT 0.40%, better
- FXL None
- VGT $0.47
- FXL
- VGT $0.15
- FXL
- VGT Sep 23, 2026
- FXL
- VGT Sep 25, 2026
- FXL
- VGT Quarterly
Distribution history
FXL vs VGT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FXL
- VGT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FXL 20.9%, betterVGT 22.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FXL 1.03VGT 1.19, better
- Worst fall
- FXL −38.5%VGT −35.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FXL 1.26VGT 1.35
FXL and VGT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





