XLK ranks 1st and FXL 15th of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.
FXL vs XLK
XLK −0.52pt a year
0.60%0.08%
XLK 63.7×the volume
130K8.28M
XLK +4.0pt
+19.7%+23.7%
FXL vs XLK Performance
+62.6%+130.6%
- FXL 0.60%
- XLK 0.08%, better
- FXL $2.68B
- XLK $125B
- FXL +21.6%, better
- XLK +20.0%
- FXL 0.00%
- XLK 0.47%, better
- FXL 111
- XLK 78
- FXL 130K sh
- XLK 8.28M sh, better
- FXL $213.51
- XLK $188.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FXL | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A76 | |
| Risk | B56 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | B63 | A98Higher |
| Holdings | A87Higher | C41 |
| Durability | B59 | A82Higher |
Rank among Technology (Broad) funds
Same Category. FXL and XLK are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FXLC
XLKA
In short
FXL A 2007-vintage tech fund that skips the cap-weighted default. Roughly 100 names selected and weighted by the rules of the StrataQuant Technology Index: smart beta before the label caught on.
XLK A 1998 original: XLK owns the technology slice of the S&P 500, about 70 names, for eight basis points. Big, heavily traded, and top-heavy by design, with quarterly caps the only brake on the giants at the top.
Stated mandate
FXL Seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield, before fees and expenses, of the StrataQuant® Technology equity index.
XLK The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Technology Select Sector Index before expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FXL vs XLK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FXL vs XLK Cost
Overpaying FXL vs XLK
$10,128
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FXL 0.60%
$11,817
XLK 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FXL | XLK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $147 | $929 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $575 | $3,541 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $1,689 | $10,128 |
- 0.60%FXL
- 0.08%XLK, cheaper
- Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
- Median 0.45%
XLK cheapest of 23 funds
FXL 16th cheapest of 23 funds
FXL vs XLK Dividends
- FXL 0.00%
- XLK 0.47%, better
- FXL None
- XLK $0.83
- FXL
- XLK $0.22
- FXL
- XLK Sep 21, 2026
- FXL
- XLK Sep 23, 2026
- FXL
- XLK Quarterly
Distribution history
FXL vs XLK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FXL
- XLK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FXL 20.9%, betterXLK 23.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FXL 1.03XLK 1.07, better
- Worst fall
- FXL −38.5%XLK −33.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FXL 1.26XLK 1.35
FXL and XLK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





