SGDM ranks 2nd and GBUG 17th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
GBUG vs SGDM
SGDM −0.44pt a year
0.90%0.46%
SGDM 1.1×the volume
31.8K36.1K
GBUG vs SGDM Performance
+11.4%+12.4%
- GBUG 0.90%
- SGDM 0.46%, better
- GBUG $146M
- SGDM $568M
- GBUG +11.4%
- SGDM +12.4%, better
- GBUG
- SGDM 1.12%
- GBUG 44
- SGDM 49
- GBUG 31.8K sh
- SGDM 36.1K sh, better
- GBUG $40.02
- SGDM $64.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GBUG | SGDM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | B68Higher |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B61 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | B56Higher |
| Holdings | A82Higher | A70 |
| Durability | D31 | B60Higher |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. GBUG and SGDM are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GBUGD
SGDMB
In short
GBUG Sprott is a precious-metals house first, an ETF shop second. GBUG is its stock-picker answer to index miner funds: an actively managed, value-oriented and contrarian book of roughly 50 gold and silver miners, explorers and royalty names.
SGDM SGDM doesn't just rank gold miners by size. It tracks a custom-factors index of roughly 50 larger miners listed in Canada and the US, and charges 0.46%, under its peer group's median fee.
Stated mandate
GBUG The ETF is actively managed and seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in shares of companies focused on gold and silver exploration, development, mining, royalty, and streaming activities.
SGDM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, which targets larger gold companies listed on Canadian and major U.S. exchanges.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GBUG vs SGDM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GBUG vs SGDM Cost
Overpaying GBUG vs SGDM
$7,810
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GBUG 0.90%
$17,040
SGDM 0.46%
$9,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GBUG | SGDM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,593 | $830 | $763 |
| 20 | $6,015 | $3,195 | $2,820 |
| 30 | $17,040 | $9,230 | $7,810 |
- 0.90%GBUG
- 0.46%SGDM, cheaper
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
SGDM 7th cheapest of 18 funds
GBUG 17th cheapest of 18 funds
GBUG vs SGDM Dividends
- GBUG
- SGDM 1.12%
- GBUG
- SGDM $0.73
- GBUG $0.68
- SGDM $0.73
- GBUG Dec 18, 2025
- SGDM Dec 18, 2025
- GBUG Dec 22, 2025
- SGDM Dec 22, 2025
- GBUG Irregular
- SGDM Annual
Distribution history
GBUG vs SGDM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GBUG 50.9%SGDM 40.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- GBUG 1.06SGDM 0.97
- Worst fall
- GBUG −37.4%SGDM −45.0%
- Market sensitivity
- GBUG 0.14SGDM 0.71
GBUG and SGDM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.90% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

