RING ranks 1st and GBUG 17th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
GBUG vs RING
RING −0.51pt a year
0.90%0.39%
RING 20.4×the volume
31.8K649K
GBUG vs RING Performance
+11.4%+10.3%
- GBUG 0.90%
- RING 0.39%, better
- GBUG $146M
- RING $2.06B
- GBUG +11.4%, better
- RING +10.3%
- GBUG
- RING 1.35%
- GBUG 44
- RING 49
- GBUG 31.8K sh
- RING 649K sh, better
- GBUG $40.02
- RING $67.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GBUG | RING |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A79Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | A82Higher | F22 |
| Durability | D31 | A81Higher |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. GBUG and RING are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GBUGD
RINGB
In short
GBUG Sprott is a precious-metals house first, an ETF shop second. GBUG is its stock-picker answer to index miner funds: an actively managed, value-oriented and contrarian book of roughly 50 gold and silver miners, explorers and royalty names.
RING The low-fee way to own the gold diggers. RING holds roughly 40 gold mining companies worldwide for 0.39% a year, undercutting most funds in its niche, and it has been running that playbook since 2012.
Stated mandate
GBUG The ETF is actively managed and seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in shares of companies focused on gold and silver exploration, development, mining, royalty, and streaming activities.
RING The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return Index. It invests at least 80% of total assets in securities of companies economically tied to gold exploration.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GBUG vs RING Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GBUG vs RING Cost
Overpaying GBUG vs RING
$9,142
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GBUG 0.90%
$17,040
RING 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GBUG | RING | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,593 | $705 | $888 |
| 20 | $6,015 | $2,725 | $3,290 |
| 30 | $17,040 | $7,898 | $9,142 |
- 0.90%GBUG
- 0.39%RING, cheaper
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
RING 4th cheapest of 18 funds
GBUG 17th cheapest of 18 funds
GBUG vs RING Dividends
- GBUG
- RING 1.35%
- GBUG
- RING $0.90
- GBUG $0.68
- RING $0.53
- GBUG Dec 18, 2025
- RING Jun 15, 2026
- GBUG Dec 22, 2025
- RING Jun 18, 2026
- GBUG Irregular
- RING Twice a year
Distribution history
GBUG vs RING Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GBUG 50.9%RING 42.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GBUG 1.06RING 1.01
- Worst fall
- GBUG −37.4%RING −47.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GBUG 0.14RING 0.94
GBUG and RING in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.90% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


