Skip to content

AUMI vs GBUG

Themes Gold Miners ETF

AUMIBNasdaq

Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF

GBUGDNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

AUMI −0.55pt a year

AUMI0.35%GBUG0.90%

Avg volume · 30D

GBUG 13.2×the volume

AUMI2.4KGBUG31.8K

AUMI vs GBUG Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.1%AUMI+11.4%GBUG

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AUMI +6.1%. GBUG +11.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%30%40%50%60%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AUMI 0.35%, better
GBUG 0.90%
Fund size
AUMI $19M
GBUG $146M
1Y total return
AUMI +6.1%
GBUG +11.4%, better
Yield (12M)
AUMI 0.98%
GBUG No data
Holdings
AUMI 34
GBUG 44
Avg volume (30D)
AUMI 2.4K sh
GBUG 31.8K sh, better
NAV per share
AUMI $81.97
GBUG $40.02
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUMI: Cost 94, Risk 48, Mission 76, Tradability 15, Holdings 78, Durability 22. GBUG: Cost 6, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 34, Holdings 82, Durability 31.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUMI, GBUG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUMIGBUG
Cost30% weightA94HigherF6
Mission25% weightA76Not scored
Risk15% weightC48B61Higher
Tradability15% weightF15D34Higher
Holdings10% weightA78A82Higher
Durability5% weightF22D31Higher

Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUMI and GBUG are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Precious Metals Miners⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

AUMI ranks 5th and GBUG 17th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.

  1. Rank 5BAGMIThemes Silver Miners ETFScore 62
  2. Rank 5BAUMIThemes Gold Miners ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 7BAUAUGlobal X Gold Miners ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 16DSLVRSprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETFScore 38
  5. Rank 17DGBUGSprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETFScore 34
  6. Rank 18FSLVXNicholas Silver Income ETFScore 11

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUMIBThemes Gold Miners ETF

GBUGDSprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF

In short

AUMI Gold miners with the blends stripped out. AUMI tracks an index of roughly 30 large miners that must earn at least 90% of revenue from gold, and it charges less than the typical fund in its group.

GBUG Sprott is a precious-metals house first, an ETF shop second. GBUG is its stock-picker answer to index miner funds: an actively managed, value-oriented and contrarian book of roughly 50 gold and silver miners, explorers and royalty names.

Stated mandate

AUMI The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of companies active in the gold mining industry. It uses a passive/indexing approach to pursue that objective.

GBUG The ETF is actively managed and seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in shares of companies focused on gold and silver exploration, development, mining, royalty, and streaming activities.

Why people hold it

  • AUMI The "pure" in the index name is a rule: members must generate at least 90% of revenue from gold mining, so copper-and-gold conglomerates and diversified diggers stay out.solactive.comthemesetfs.com
  • A 0.35% fee undercuts the peer-group median and the category's household names, VanEck's GDX (0.51%) and iShares' RING (0.39%).
  • Roughly 30 names, free-float weighted, rebuilt on a set schedule: a concentrated, rules-based way to own the diggers rather than the metal.solactive.com
  • GBUG Actively managed on a value-oriented, contrarian screen, so the book can lean toward beaten-up miners instead of whatever the market-cap index says is biggest.
  • The mandate covers the whole chain: exploration, development, mining, royalty and streaming companies, not just the big producers.
  • Roughly 50 holdings from a firm whose entire business is precious metals, so each pick carries real weight in the portfolio.

Worth knowing

  • AUMI Thinly traded and small next to the group's giants, so bid-ask spreads can be wider and big orders can push the price.
  • Concentrated by design and non-diversified: about 30 miners, one commodity, plus mine-level risks like costs, permits and politics.themesetfs.com
  • Launched in December 2023, so the live track record is short, and cash comes back once or twice a year rather than monthly.
  • GBUG Charges 0.90% a year, above the typical fund in the miners group; index rivals like GDX and RING run meaningfully cheaper.
  • Launched in 2025, so the manager's record in this wrapper is short and any read on its risk profile rests on limited history.
  • Thinly traded with a modest asset base, so spreads can run wider than the household-name miner ETFs.

Full AUMI profile⁠

Full GBUG profile⁠

AUMI vs GBUG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUMI vs GBUG Cost

Overpaying GBUG vs AUMI

$9,914

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUMI 0.35%

    $7,126

  • GBUG 0.90%

    $17,040

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUMI 0.35%
  • GBUG 0.90%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GBUG $17,040AUMI $7,126

Year by year

YearAUMIGBUGOverpaying
10$634$1,593$959
20$2,454$6,015$3,561
30$7,126$17,040$9,914

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%AUMI, cheaper
  • 0.90%GBUG
  • Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
  • Median 0.52%

AUMI cheapest of 18 funds

GBUG 17th cheapest of 18 funds

AUMI vs GBUG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AUMI 0.98%
GBUG No data
Payout (12M)
AUMI $0.80
GBUG No data
Last payment
AUMI $0.80
GBUG $0.68
Ex-dividend
AUMI Dec 18, 2025
GBUG Dec 18, 2025
Paid on
AUMI Dec 19, 2025
GBUG Dec 22, 2025
Frequency
AUMI Irregular
GBUG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

AUMIIrregular · 2 paymentsAll AUMI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2024 $0.65; Dec 18, 2025 $0.80. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
GBUGIrregular · 1 paymentAll GBUG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2025 $0.68. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

AUMI vs GBUG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUMI 43.7%since Jan 2024GBUG 50.9%since Mar 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUMI 1.01since Jan 2024GBUG 1.06since Mar 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUMI −39.8%since Dec 2023GBUG −37.4%since Feb 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUMI 0.05GBUG 0.14

Popular comparisons

  • AUMIBvsRINGB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GBUGDvsRINGB

    Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUMIBvsSGDMB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · Sprott Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GBUGDvsSGDMB

    Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF · Sprott Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUMIBvsGDXB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GBUGDvsGDXB

    Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.