AUMI ranks 5th and GBUG 17th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
AUMI vs GBUG
AUMI −0.55pt a year
0.35%0.90%
GBUG 13.2×the volume
2.4K31.8K
AUMI vs GBUG Performance
+6.1%+11.4%
- AUMI 0.35%, better
- GBUG 0.90%
- AUMI $19M
- GBUG $146M
- AUMI +6.1%
- GBUG +11.4%, better
- AUMI 0.98%
- GBUG
- AUMI 34
- GBUG 44
- AUMI 2.4K sh
- GBUG 31.8K sh, better
- AUMI $81.97
- GBUG $40.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AUMI | GBUG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | F6 |
| Mission | A76 | |
| Risk | C48 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | F15 | D34Higher |
| Holdings | A78 | A82Higher |
| Durability | F22 | D31Higher |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. AUMI and GBUG are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AUMIB
GBUGD
In short
AUMI Gold miners with the blends stripped out. AUMI tracks an index of roughly 30 large miners that must earn at least 90% of revenue from gold, and it charges less than the typical fund in its group.
GBUG Sprott is a precious-metals house first, an ETF shop second. GBUG is its stock-picker answer to index miner funds: an actively managed, value-oriented and contrarian book of roughly 50 gold and silver miners, explorers and royalty names.
Stated mandate
AUMI The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of companies active in the gold mining industry. It uses a passive/indexing approach to pursue that objective.
GBUG The ETF is actively managed and seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in shares of companies focused on gold and silver exploration, development, mining, royalty, and streaming activities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AUMI vs GBUG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AUMI vs GBUG Cost
Overpaying GBUG vs AUMI
$9,914
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AUMI 0.35%
$7,126
GBUG 0.90%
$17,040
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AUMI | GBUG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $1,593 | $959 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $6,015 | $3,561 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $17,040 | $9,914 |
- 0.35%AUMI, cheaper
- 0.90%GBUG
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
AUMI cheapest of 18 funds
GBUG 17th cheapest of 18 funds
AUMI vs GBUG Dividends
- AUMI 0.98%
- GBUG
- AUMI $0.80
- GBUG
- AUMI $0.80
- GBUG $0.68
- AUMI Dec 18, 2025
- GBUG Dec 18, 2025
- AUMI Dec 19, 2025
- GBUG Dec 22, 2025
- AUMI Irregular
- GBUG Irregular
Distribution history
AUMI vs GBUG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AUMI 43.7%GBUG 50.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- AUMI 1.01GBUG 1.06
- Worst fall
- AUMI −39.8%GBUG −37.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AUMI 0.05GBUG 0.14
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.