Skip to content

GCAL vs VCRM

Goldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETF

GCALBNYSE Arca

Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond E

VCRMACboe

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

VCRM −0.18pt a year

GCAL0.30%VCRM0.12%

Avg volume · 30D

VCRM 11.6×the volume

GCAL58.5KVCRM679K

GCAL vs VCRM Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+1.1%GCAL+1.2%VCRM

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. GCAL +1.1%. VCRM +1.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−3%−2%−1%2%3%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GCAL 0.30%
VCRM 0.12%, better
Fund size
GCAL $260M
VCRM $2.2B
1Y total return
GCAL +1.1%
VCRM +1.2%, better
Yield (12M)
GCAL 3.91%
VCRM 4.10%, better
Holdings
GCAL 436
VCRM 2595
Avg volume (30D)
GCAL 58.5K sh
VCRM 679K sh, better
NAV per share
GCAL $49.74
VCRM $73.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GCAL: Cost 48, Risk 68, Mission 89, Tradability 45, Holdings 55, Durability 54. VCRM: Cost 89, Risk 68, Mission 100, Tradability 80, Holdings 81, Durability 74.
Pillar letters and Scores for GCAL, VCRM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGCALVCRM
Cost30% weightC48A89Higher
Mission25% weightA89A100Higher
Risk15% weightB68B68
Tradability15% weightC45A80Higher
Holdings10% weightB55A81Higher
Durability5% weightC54A74Higher

Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GCAL and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Other Municipal Bond⁠

Category · 63 funds
See all 63 ›

VCRM ranks 2nd and GCAL 26th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.

  1. Rank 1AVTEBVanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2AMUBiShares National Muni Bond ETFScore 85
  3. Rank 2AVCRMVanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond EScore 85
  4. Rank 4ASCMBSchwab Municipal Bond ETFScore 84
  5. Rank 24BMMINNYLI MacKay Muni Insured ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 26BGCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETFScore 61
  7. Rank 27BFTMUFranklin Municipal Income ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GCALBGoldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETF

VCRMAVanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond E

In short

GCAL Goldman's California-only muni fund: actively run rather than index-tracking, with a two-to-eight-year duration band and room for up to 30% junk-rated muni credit. It chases income exempt from both federal and California income tax.

VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.

Stated mandate

GCAL The Fund seeks a high level of current income exempt from regular federal income tax and California personal income tax.

VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • GCAL Double tax-exempt by design: it targets income free of regular federal and California personal income tax, with at least 80% in qualifying munis as a shareholder-approved policy.sec.gov
  • Fee lands near the muni category median: 0.30% net of a waiver through December 29, 2026 (0.35% gross). VTEB (0.03%) and MUB (0.05%) cost less but skip the California exemption.
  • Genuinely active: duration can run two to eight years and up to 30% of assets may be non-investment-grade munis, so managers can dial credit and rate exposure up or down.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • Pays monthly and spreads across roughly 400 California positions, and it sits in the upper half of its muni peer group on our review.
  • VCRM Active management priced at 0.12% a year, less than half the 0.30% median for muni ETFs.
  • Run by Vanguard's Fixed Income Group, with all-curve exposure to primarily high-quality investment-grade munis spread across sectors, states and credit tiers.prnewswire.com
  • Pays monthly, with income the fund seeks to keep exempt from federal personal income taxes.vanguard.com
  • Sticks tightly to its stated mandate and grades among the strongest implementations in its muni peer group.

Worth knowing

  • GCAL Single-state and non-diversified: California budget stress or one large local credit event bites harder here than in a national muni fund.sec.gov
  • Up to 100% of assets can be private activity bonds, whose income may be a preference item for the federal alternative minimum tax.sec.gov
  • Thinly traded next to the national muni giants, so spreads can run wider. The 0.30% net fee also leans on a waiver running to December 29, 2026.
  • VCRM You pay up for the manager: index peers VTEB and SCMB run at 0.03%, a quarter of VCRM's 0.12%.
  • Launched in November 2024, so there is only a short record to judge the active mandate on.
  • All-curve exposure puts longer maturities in the mix, so prices move with rates. And the exemption is federal: state treatment of a national muni fund depends on where you live.prnewswire.com

Full GCAL profile⁠

Full VCRM profile⁠

GCAL vs VCRM Holdings

How GCAL and VCRM differ

No overlap figure

Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.

Level by level

  • Countryby domicile88.5%
  • Asset classFixed Income100%

Sector

No Sector split for GCAL and VCRM.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GCAL and VCRM, widest gap first
CountryMore in GCALMore in VCRM
United StatesVCRM +11.5 points
Puerto RicoGCAL +11.0 points
CanadaGCAL +0.5 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GCAL14.6%
  • VCRM8.8%

Securities held

  • GCAL423
  • VCRM2,433

Asset class

GCAL
Fixed Income
VCRM
Fixed Income

Holdings

Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. GCAL holds 423 securities, VCRM 2,433.

All 434 GCAL holdings⁠All VCRM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GCAL vs VCRM Cost

Overpaying GCAL vs VCRM

$3,629

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GCAL 0.30%

    $6,149

  • VCRM 0.12%

    $2,520

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GCAL 0.30%
  • VCRM 0.12%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530GCAL $6,149VCRM $2,520

Year by year

YearGCALVCRMOverpaying
10$545$220$325
20$2,113$859$1,254
30$6,149$2,520$3,629

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GCAL
  • 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
  • Median 0.30%

VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds

GCAL 30th cheapest of 63 funds

GCAL vs VCRM Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
GCAL 3.91%
VCRM 4.10%, better
Payout (12M)
GCAL $1.94
VCRM $3.03
Last payment
GCAL $0.13
VCRM $0.21
Ex-dividend
GCAL Nov 2, 2026
VCRM Nov 2, 2026
Paid on
GCAL Pays Nov 6, 2026
VCRM Pays Nov 4, 2026
Frequency
GCAL Monthly
VCRM Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

GCALMonthly · 27 paymentsAll GCAL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 27 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Sep 3, 2024 $0.16; Oct 1, 2024 $0.15; Nov 1, 2024 $0.13; Dec 2, 2024 $0.13; Dec 31, 2024 $0.14; Feb 3, 2025 $0.13; Mar 3, 2025 $0.10; Apr 1, 2025 $0.14; May 1, 2025 $0.11; Jun 2, 2025 $0.13; Jul 1, 2025 $0.13; Aug 1, 2025 $0.06; Sep 2, 2025 $0.14; Oct 1, 2025 $0.16; Nov 3, 2025 $0.15; Dec 1, 2025 $0.14; Dec 31, 2025 $0.16; Feb 2, 2026 $0.15; Mar 2, 2026 $0.14; Apr 1, 2026 $0.16; May 1, 2026 $0.15; Jun 1, 2026 $0.15; Jul 1, 2026 $0.16; Aug 3, 2026 $0.15; Sep 1, 2026 $0.15; Oct 1, 2026 $0.14; Nov 2, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
VCRMMonthly · 23 paymentsAll VCRM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 23 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2024 $0.30; Feb 3, 2025 $0.18; Mar 3, 2025 $0.19; Apr 1, 2025 $0.22; May 1, 2025 $0.18; Jun 2, 2025 $0.22; Jul 1, 2025 $0.23; Aug 1, 2025 $0.22; Sep 2, 2025 $0.22; Oct 1, 2025 $0.22; Nov 3, 2025 $0.23; Dec 1, 2025 $0.24; Dec 18, 2025 $0.24; Feb 2, 2026 $0.23; Mar 2, 2026 $0.23; Apr 1, 2026 $0.24; May 1, 2026 $0.24; Jun 1, 2026 $0.22; Jul 1, 2026 $0.24; Aug 3, 2026 $0.24; Sep 1, 2026 $0.25; Oct 1, 2026 $0.21; Nov 2, 2026 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

GCAL vs VCRM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GCAL 4.4%since Aug 2024VCRM 5.6%since Dec 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GCAL −0.29since Aug 2024VCRM −0.32since Dec 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GCAL −5.4%since Jul 2024VCRM −6.3%since Nov 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GCAL 0.16VCRM 0.17

Popular comparisons

  • GCALBvsVTEBA

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETF · Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VCRMAvsVTEBA

    Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond E · Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GCALBvsMUBA

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETF · iShares National Muni Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VCRMAvsMUBA

    Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond E · iShares National Muni Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GCALBvsSCMBA

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETF · Schwab Municipal Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VCRMAvsSCMBA

    Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond E · Schwab Municipal Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.