IRTR ranks 3rd and GDMA 28th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
GDMA vs IRTR
IRTR −0.67pt a year
0.75%0.08%
GDMA 1.1×the volume
14.3K12.7K
IRTR +0.2pt
+12.9%+13.1%
GDMA vs IRTR Performance
+5.8%+5.1%
- GDMA 0.75%
- IRTR 0.08%, better
- GDMA $213M
- IRTR $60M
- GDMA +5.8%, better
- IRTR +5.1%
- GDMA 2.67%
- IRTR 3.17%, better
- GDMA 19
- IRTR 29140
- GDMA 14.3K sh, better
- IRTR 12.7K sh
- GDMA $40.26
- IRTR $31.52
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GDMA | IRTR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A97Higher |
| Mission | F17 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C44 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | B69Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | C40 | A80Higher |
| Durability | B62Higher | B56 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. GDMA and IRTR are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GDMAD
IRTRA
In short
GDMA A go-anywhere allocation fund with no benchmark to hug: Gadsden's managers blend a long-term macro view with short-term tactical shifts across global stocks, bonds, currencies and REITs.
IRTR A whole retirement portfolio in one ticker: global stock and bond ETFs blended at the conservative end, for 0.08% a year. That is index-fund pricing on a job most allocation funds charge roughly ten times more to do.
Stated mandate
GDMA The Fund seeks total return through active allocation among asset classes selected for their perceived risk/return opportunities. Its allocations can span global markets and may change with strategic and tactical views.
IRTR The fund seeks conservative exposure through a broad portfolio of stock and bond ETFs spanning global asset classes.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GDMA vs IRTR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GDMA vs IRTR Cost
Overpaying GDMA vs IRTR
$12,793
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GDMA 0.75%
$14,482
IRTR 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GDMA | IRTR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $147 | $1,189 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $575 | $4,503 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $1,689 | $12,793 |
- 0.75%GDMA
- 0.08%IRTR, cheaper
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
IRTR 2nd cheapest of 37 funds
GDMA 23rd cheapest of 37 funds
GDMA vs IRTR Dividends
- GDMA 2.67%
- IRTR 3.17%, better
- GDMA $1.08
- IRTR $1.00
- GDMA $1.08
- IRTR $0.08
- GDMA Dec 30, 2025
- IRTR Oct 2, 2026
- GDMA Dec 31, 2025
- IRTR Oct 7, 2026
- GDMA Annual
- IRTR Monthly
Distribution history
GDMA vs IRTR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GDMA 10.0%IRTR 7.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GDMA 0.82IRTR 1.14, better
- Worst fall
- GDMA −12.8%IRTR −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- GDMA 0.51IRTR 0.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.