SGDM ranks 2nd and GDMN 11th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
GDMN vs SGDM
GDMN −0.01pt a year
0.45%0.46%
GDMN 1.5×the volume
52K35.6K
GDMN +12.1pt
+52.5%+40.4%
GDMN vs SGDM Performance
−5.2%+14.1%
- GDMN 0.45%, better
- SGDM 0.46%
- GDMN $150M
- SGDM $581M
- GDMN −5.2%
- SGDM +14.1%, better
- GDMN 8.38%, better
- SGDM 1.11%
- GDMN 59
- SGDM 49
- GDMN 52K sh, better
- SGDM 35.6K sh
- GDMN $65.21
- SGDM $66.52
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GDMN | SGDM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | B68 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A78 |
| Risk | F22 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | A70Higher |
| Durability | C45 | B60Higher |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. GDMN and SGDM are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GDMNC
SGDMB
In short
GDMN Gold or the miners? GDMN declines to choose. For every $100 it aims to hold roughly $90 of global gold miners plus gold futures worth about $90 more in notional terms, stacking two gold trades into one ticker.
SGDM SGDM doesn't just rank gold miners by size. It tracks a custom-factors index of roughly 50 larger miners listed in Canada and the US, and charges 0.46%, under its peer group's median fee.
Stated mandate
GDMN The Fund seeks total return by investing in U.S.-listed gold futures contracts and global equity securities of companies deriving at least 50% of their revenue from gold mining. Gold futures are used to enhance capital efficiency.
SGDM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, which targets larger gold companies listed on Canadian and major U.S. exchanges.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GDMN vs SGDM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GDMN vs SGDM Cost
Overpaying SGDM vs GDMN
$189
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GDMN 0.45%
$9,041
SGDM 0.46%
$9,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GDMN | SGDM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $830 | $18 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $3,195 | $67 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $9,230 | $189 |
- 0.45%GDMN, cheaper
- 0.46%SGDM
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
GDMN 6th cheapest of 18 funds
SGDM 7th cheapest of 18 funds
GDMN vs SGDM Dividends
- GDMN 8.38%, better
- SGDM 1.11%
- GDMN $5.51
- SGDM $0.73
- GDMN $5.28
- SGDM $0.73
- GDMN Oct 27, 2026
- SGDM Dec 18, 2025
- GDMN Oct 29, 2026
- SGDM Dec 22, 2025
- GDMN Annual
- SGDM Annual
Distribution history
GDMN vs SGDM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GDMN 53.1%SGDM 40.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GDMN 0.99, betterSGDM 0.97
- Worst fall
- GDMN −52.8%SGDM −45.0%
- Market sensitivity
- GDMN 0.87SGDM 0.71
GDMN and SGDM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



