PSMR ranks 3rd and GFEB 30th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
GFEB vs PSMR
PSMR −0.36pt a year
0.85%0.49%
GFEB 9.3×the volume
11.7K1.26K
GFEB +1.3pt
+14.1%+12.8%
GFEB vs PSMR Performance
+10.2%+12.1%
- GFEB 0.85%
- PSMR 0.49%, better
- GFEB $369M
- PSMR $91M
- GFEB +10.2%
- PSMR +12.1%, better
- GFEB 3
- PSMR 3
- GFEB 11.7K sh, better
- PSMR 1.26K sh
- GFEB $45.04
- PSMR $33.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GFEB | PSMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | B63Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | B60 | |
| Durability | A75Higher | B64 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. GFEB and PSMR are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GFEBC
PSMRB
In short
GFEB A one-year seatbelt on the S&P 500: GFEB soaks up the first 15% of losses over its outcome period, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap that gets reset every February.
PSMR A 15-point cushion on SPY, reset every April, for 0.49% a year while the typical buffer fund charges more. Pacer and Swan's moderate tier trades away some upside (a cap set each period) for a floor you know going in.
Stated mandate
GFEB The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust up to a 12.05% upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses over the February 23, 2026–February 19, 2027 outcome period.
PSMR The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GFEB vs PSMR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GFEB vs PSMR Cost
Overpaying GFEB vs PSMR
$6,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GFEB 0.85%
$16,199
PSMR 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GFEB | PSMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $883 | $625 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,394 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $9,792 | $6,407 |
- 0.85%GFEB
- 0.49%PSMR, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMR 5th cheapest of 51 funds
GFEB 37th cheapest of 51 funds
GFEB vs PSMR Dividends
- GFEB None
- PSMR None
Distribution history
GFEB vs PSMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GFEB 6.0%PSMR 6.0%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- GFEB 1.50, betterPSMR 1.31
- Worst fall
- GFEB −9.6%PSMR −11.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GFEB 0.45PSMR 0.45Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.