BUFC ranks 4th and GFEB 30th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
BUFC vs GFEB
BUFC −0.16pt a year
0.69%0.85%
BUFC 4.2×the volume
49.5K11.7K
BUFC vs GFEB Performance
+5.8%+10.2%
- BUFC 0.69%, better
- GFEB 0.85%
- BUFC $1.11B
- GFEB $369M
- BUFC +5.8%
- GFEB +10.2%, better
- BUFC 4
- GFEB 3
- BUFC 49.5K sh, better
- GFEB 11.7K sh
- BUFC $43.25
- GFEB $45.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFC | GFEB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57Higher | F13 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | B63Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | |
| Durability | A74 | A75Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. BUFC and GFEB are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFCB
GFEBC
In short
BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.
GFEB A one-year seatbelt on the S&P 500: GFEB soaks up the first 15% of losses over its outcome period, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap that gets reset every February.
Stated mandate
BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.
GFEB The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust up to a 12.05% upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses over the February 23, 2026–February 19, 2027 outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFC vs GFEB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFC vs GFEB Cost
Overpaying GFEB vs BUFC
$2,770
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFC 0.69%
$13,429
GFEB 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFC | GFEB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,508 | $276 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,706 | $1,009 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $16,199 | $2,770 |
- 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
- 0.85%GFEB
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds
GFEB 37th cheapest of 51 funds
BUFC vs GFEB Dividends
- BUFC None
- GFEB None
Distribution history
BUFC vs GFEB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFC 3.4%GFEB 6.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFC 0.82GFEB 1.50
- Worst fall
- BUFC −8.3%GFEB −9.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFC 0.26GFEB 0.45
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.