IMCG ranks 2nd and GGUS 18th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
GGUS vs IMCG
IMCG −0.06pt a year
0.12%0.06%
IMCG 4.8×the volume
27.8K132K
GGUS vs IMCG Performance
−1.4%+14.0%
- GGUS 0.12%
- IMCG 0.06%, better
- GGUS $482M
- IMCG $4.04B
- GGUS −1.4%
- IMCG +14.0%, better
- GGUS 0.42%
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- GGUS 370
- IMCG 262
- GGUS 27.8K sh
- IMCG 132K sh, better
- GGUS $65.97
- IMCG $93.24
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GGUS | IMCG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A95 |
| Risk | C40 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | D33 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | A75Higher |
| Durability | D26 | B66Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. GGUS and IMCG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GGUSB
IMCGA
In short
GGUS Goldman's plain-vanilla shelf. GGUS tracks the same Russell 1000 Growth index the household names use, charges 0.12%, and undercuts the category's median fee. No stock picking, no Goldman house view, just the growth half of US large caps.
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
Stated mandate
GGUS The Fund seeks returns that closely track its underlying index before fees and expenses.
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GGUS vs IMCG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GGUS vs IMCG Cost
Overpaying GGUS vs IMCG
$1,250
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GGUS 0.12%
$2,520
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GGUS | IMCG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $110 | $110 |
| 20 | $859 | $432 | $427 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $1,270 | $1,250 |
- 0.12%GGUS
- 0.06%IMCG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
GGUS 15th cheapest of 35 funds
GGUS vs IMCG Dividends
- GGUS 0.42%
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- GGUS $0.27
- IMCG $0.62
- GGUS $0.06
- IMCG $0.19
- GGUS Sep 24, 2026
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- GGUS Sep 30, 2026
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- GGUS Quarterly
- IMCG Quarterly
Distribution history
GGUS vs IMCG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GGUS 15.5%IMCG 16.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- GGUS 0.86IMCG 0.97
- Worst fall
- GGUS −22.6%IMCG −35.1%
- Market sensitivity
- GGUS 1.14IMCG 1.14Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
GGUS and IMCG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

