GII ranks 3rd and IPAV 22nd of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
GII vs IPAV
GII −0.15pt a year
0.40%0.55%
GII 28.3×the volume
41.6K1.47K
GII vs IPAV Performance
+11.3%+5.8%
- GII 0.40%, better
- IPAV 0.55%
- GII $962M
- IPAV $6M
- GII +11.3%, better
- IPAV +5.8%
- GII 2.69%, better
- IPAV 1.60%
- GII 89
- IPAV 103
- GII 41.6K sh, better
- IPAV 1.47K sh
- GII $74.56
- IPAV $29.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GII | IPAV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | C53 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | A72Higher | F15 |
| Holdings | B68Higher | B62 |
| Durability | A85Higher | D29 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. GII and IPAV are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIIA
IPAVD
In short
GII Toll roads, airports, pipelines and power grids in one ticker. GII has tracked the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, an early entrant in the category, and charges less than the typical infrastructure fund.
IPAV Most of the world's building happens outside the United States. IPAV takes the infrastructure-development idea (contractors, materials, equipment, any sector) and points it entirely overseas, across developed and emerging markets.
Stated mandate
GII The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. That index provides exposure to large publicly listed infrastructure companies across transportation, utilities, and energy infrastructure.
IPAV IPAV seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GII vs IPAV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GII vs IPAV Cost
Overpaying IPAV vs GII
$2,814
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GII 0.40%
$8,090
IPAV 0.55%
$10,904
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GII | IPAV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $988 | $265 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $3,790 | $997 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $10,904 | $2,814 |
- 0.40%GII, cheaper
- 0.55%IPAV
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
GII 6th cheapest of 33 funds
IPAV 15th cheapest of 33 funds
GII vs IPAV Dividends
- GII 2.69%, better
- IPAV 1.60%
- GII $2.02
- IPAV $0.48
- GII $0.78
- IPAV $0.23
- GII Jun 1, 2026
- IPAV Jun 29, 2026
- GII Jun 3, 2026
- IPAV Jul 7, 2026
- GII Twice a year
- IPAV Twice a year
Distribution history
GII vs IPAV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GII 12.5%IPAV 16.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- GII 1.17IPAV 0.35
- Worst fall
- GII −20.7%IPAV −17.2%
- Market sensitivity
- GII 0.56IPAV 0.80
GII and IPAV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

