GII ranks 3rd and PWRZ 24th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
GII vs PWRZ
GII −0.35pt a year
0.40%0.75%
GII 10.4×the volume
41.6K4K
GII vs PWRZ Performance
−1.3%−1.8%
- GII 0.40%, better
- PWRZ 0.75%
- GII $962M
- PWRZ $12M
- GII +11.3%
- PWRZ
- GII 2.69%, better
- PWRZ 1.69%
- GII 89
- PWRZ 24
- GII 41.6K sh, better
- PWRZ 4K sh
- GII $74.56
- PWRZ $29.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GII | PWRZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | F24 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | A72Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | B68 | |
| Durability | A85Higher | C41 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. GII and PWRZ are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIIA
PWRZD
In short
GII Toll roads, airports, pipelines and power grids in one ticker. GII has tracked the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, an early entrant in the category, and charges less than the typical infrastructure fund.
PWRZ Launched in 2022 as a renewable energy income fund, renamed in 2026 to next gen power infrastructure. Same active, global, concentrated approach to the companies that make and move electricity.
Stated mandate
GII The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. That index provides exposure to large publicly listed infrastructure companies across transportation, utilities, and energy infrastructure.
PWRZ The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital and, under normal conditions, commits at least 80% of its assets to Power Infrastructure Companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GII vs PWRZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GII vs PWRZ Cost
Overpaying PWRZ vs GII
$6,392
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GII 0.40%
$8,090
PWRZ 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GII | PWRZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $1,336 | $613 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $5,078 | $2,285 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $14,482 | $6,392 |
- 0.40%GII, cheaper
- 0.75%PWRZ
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
GII 6th cheapest of 33 funds
PWRZ 25th cheapest of 33 funds
GII vs PWRZ Dividends
- GII 2.69%, better
- PWRZ 1.69%
- GII $2.02
- PWRZ $0.51
- GII $0.78
- PWRZ $0.15
- GII Jun 1, 2026
- PWRZ Sep 29, 2026
- GII Jun 3, 2026
- PWRZ Sep 30, 2026
- GII Twice a year
- PWRZ Quarterly
Distribution history
GII vs PWRZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GII 12.5%PWRZ
- Return per unit of risk
- GII 1.17PWRZ
- Worst fall
- GII −20.7%PWRZ
- Market sensitivity
- GII 0.56PWRZ 0.70
GII and PWRZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

