Skip to content

GJAN vs PSMJ

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January

GJANCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

PSMJBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSMJ −0.36pt a year

GJAN0.85%PSMJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

GJAN 1.7×the volume

GJAN11.5KPSMJ6.64K

3Y return · a year

PSMJ +1.4pt

GJAN+12.3%PSMJ+13.7%

GJAN vs PSMJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+9.5%GJAN+7.9%PSMJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. GJAN +9.5%. PSMJ +7.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GJAN 0.85%
PSMJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
GJAN $433M
PSMJ $108M
1Y total return
GJAN +9.5%, better
PSMJ +7.9%
Yield (12M)
GJAN No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Holdings
GJAN 3
PSMJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
GJAN 11.5K sh, better
PSMJ 6.64K sh
NAV per share
GJAN $46.07
PSMJ $34.43
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GJAN: Cost 13, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 59, Durability 76. PSMJ: Cost 70, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 63.
Pillar letters and Scores for GJAN, PSMJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGJANPSMJ
Cost30% weightF13A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC54HigherC47
Tradability15% weightB65HigherC50
Holdings10% weightB59Not scored
Durability5% weightA76HigherB63

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GJAN and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMJ ranks 2nd and GJAN 30th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 30CGFEBFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 41
  5. Rank 30CGJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 41
  6. Rank 33CCAUGCorgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GJANCFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January

PSMJBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

In short

GJAN A 15% shock absorber on the S&P 500, running on a January clock. GJAN is built to absorb the reference ETF's first 15% of price losses over each one-year outcome period, and to trade away gains above a cap set when that period begins.

PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.

Stated mandate

GJAN The Fund seeks to provide returns matching the price return of the stated S&P 500 ETF, before fees and expenses, subject to an upside cap. It also protects against the first 15% of losses during the specified outcome period.

PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • GJAN The deal is written down before you commit: the first 15% of the reference S&P 500 ETF's price decline is absorbed over the outcome period, with an upside cap fixed at the start.
  • Resets every January, and it is one month in a full calendar of identical siblings (GAPR, GJUL, GOCT and the rest), so laddering across start dates stays inside one lineup.
  • The thing being buffered is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not a bespoke index, and this January cycle has been turning since the 2023 launch.
  • PSMJ Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median for its buffered-SPY cohort, the same 0.79% Innovator's Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) charge for a similar job.
  • The deal is legible: FLEX options on SPY absorb the first 15% of a decline over the outcome period, and match the ETF's gains up to a cap struck each July.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • Those FLEX options are customizable exchange-traded contracts settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, and Durango-based Swan Global Management sub-advises the strategy.paceretfs.com
  • One of four Moderate-series funds with staggered start months (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ, PSMO), so a July reset can be stacked against other entry points rather than standing alone.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • GJAN 0.85% a year sits above cohort rivals PJAN and PJUL at 0.79%, and well above the laddered BUFF at 0.10%.
  • Buffer and cap are stated before fees and expenses, so the 0.85% comes out of your slice, and the cap means strong rallies get left on the table.
  • Bought mid-period, your own cushion and cap differ from the headline terms. Daily volume is on the lighter side, so the spread is worth a look.
  • PSMJ The 15% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Step in mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer remain, not the starting terms.paceretfs.com
  • Thinly traded next to the largest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders deserve more of your attention at the point of entry.
  • No regular income stream here: the options structure delivers its result through share price rather than distributions.paceretfs.com

Full GJAN profile⁠

Full PSMJ profile⁠

GJAN vs PSMJ Holdings

How GJAN and PSMJ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GJAN and 0.0% of PSMJ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in GJAN and PSMJ, widest gap first
SectorMore in GJANMore in PSMJ
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GJAN and PSMJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in GJANMore in PSMJ
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GJAN102.2%
  • PSMJ102.8%

Securities held

  • GJAN2
  • PSMJ2

Asset class

GJAN
Multi-Asset
PSMJ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GJAN2
  • In both0
  • Only in PSMJ2

Only in GJAN

2 securities, 100% of GJAN by weight

  • 2027-01-15 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 6.94100.82%
  • 2027-01-15 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 691.680.94%

Only in PSMJ

2 securities, 100% of PSMJ by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 8.29 C98.14%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 746.84 P4.03%

Weight gaps

GJAN and PSMJ share no securities.

All 4 GJAN holdings⁠All 6 PSMJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GJAN vs PSMJ Cost

Overpaying GJAN vs PSMJ

$6,407

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GJAN 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PSMJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GJAN 0.85%
  • PSMJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GJAN $16,199PSMJ $9,792

Year by year

YearGJANPSMJOverpaying
10$1,508$883$625
20$5,706$3,394$2,312
30$16,199$9,792$6,407

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%GJAN
  • 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds

GJAN 37th cheapest of 51 funds

GJAN vs PSMJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
GJAN No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Payout (12M)
GJAN None
PSMJ None

Distribution history

Per share, 2021, same scale for both

GJANAll GJAN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMJ1 paymentAll PSMJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2021. Dec 23, 2021 $0.0038. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.00252021

GJAN vs PSMJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GJAN 6.0%, betterPSMJ 6.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GJAN 1.37PSMJ 1.47, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GJAN −10.6%since Jan 2023PSMJ −10.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GJAN 0.45PSMJ 0.47

Popular comparisons

  • GJANCvsPSMOB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GJANCvsPSMRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GJANCvsBUFCB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.