PSMJ ranks 2nd and GJAN 30th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
GJAN vs PSMJ
0.0%by weight
PSMJ −0.36pt a year
0.85%0.49%
GJAN 1.7×the volume
11.5K6.64K
PSMJ +1.4pt
+12.3%+13.7%
GJAN vs PSMJ Performance
+9.5%+7.9%
- GJAN 0.85%
- PSMJ 0.49%, better
- GJAN $433M
- PSMJ $108M
- GJAN +9.5%, better
- PSMJ +7.9%
- GJAN
- PSMJ 0.00%
- GJAN 3
- PSMJ 3
- GJAN 11.5K sh, better
- PSMJ 6.64K sh
- GJAN $46.07
- PSMJ $34.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GJAN | PSMJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C54Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | B65Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | B59 | |
| Durability | A76Higher | B63 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. GJAN and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GJANC
PSMJB
In short
GJAN A 15% shock absorber on the S&P 500, running on a January clock. GJAN is built to absorb the reference ETF's first 15% of price losses over each one-year outcome period, and to trade away gains above a cap set when that period begins.
PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.
Stated mandate
GJAN The Fund seeks to provide returns matching the price return of the stated S&P 500 ETF, before fees and expenses, subject to an upside cap. It also protects against the first 15% of losses during the specified outcome period.
PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GJAN vs PSMJ Holdings
How GJAN and PSMJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GJAN and 0.0% of PSMJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in GJANMore in PSMJ | GJAN | PSMJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in GJANMore in PSMJ | GJAN | PSMJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- GJAN102.2%
- PSMJ102.8%
- GJAN2
- PSMJ2
Asset class
- GJAN
- Multi-Asset
- PSMJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in GJAN2
- In both0
- Only in PSMJ2
Only in GJAN
2 securities, 100% of GJAN by weight
- 2027-01-15 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 6.94100.82%
- 2027-01-15 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 691.680.94%
Only in PSMJ
2 securities, 100% of PSMJ by weight
- Spy 06/30/2027 8.29 C98.14%
- Spy 06/30/2027 746.84 P4.03%
Weight gaps
GJAN and PSMJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GJAN vs PSMJ Cost
Overpaying GJAN vs PSMJ
$6,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GJAN 0.85%
$16,199
PSMJ 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GJAN | PSMJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $883 | $625 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,394 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $9,792 | $6,407 |
- 0.85%GJAN
- 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds
GJAN 37th cheapest of 51 funds
GJAN vs PSMJ Dividends
- GJAN
- PSMJ 0.00%
- GJAN None
- PSMJ None
Distribution history
GJAN vs PSMJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GJAN 6.0%, betterPSMJ 6.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GJAN 1.37PSMJ 1.47, better
- Worst fall
- GJAN −10.6%PSMJ −10.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GJAN 0.45PSMJ 0.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.