QLD ranks 1st and GLDW 34th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
GLDW vs QLD
QLD −0.10pt a year
0.99%0.89%
QLD 485.2×the volume
9.36K4.54M
GLDW vs QLD Performance
−1.5%+13.1%
- GLDW 0.99%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- GLDW $18M
- QLD $11.5B
- GLDW −1.5%
- QLD +13.1%, better
- GLDW
- QLD 0.16%
- GLDW 3
- QLD 114
- GLDW 9.36K sh
- QLD 4.54M sh, better
- GLDW $37.35
- QLD $74.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GLDW | QLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | A72Higher |
| Mission | B60 | A96Higher |
| Risk | C50 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | A70 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | C40 | B65Higher |
| Durability | B60 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. GLDW and QLD are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GLDWC
QLDA
In short
GLDW Gold, geared, on a payday schedule. GLDW targets 1.2 times the SPDR Gold Trust's weekly total return before fees and distributes weekly, a milder, week-by-week take on leverage in a cohort built around 3x daily resets.
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
Stated mandate
GLDW GLDW seeks weekly distributions and calendar-week returns equal to 1.2 times the weekly total return of the SPDR Gold Trust, before fees and expenses.
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GLDW vs QLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GLDW vs QLD Cost
Overpaying GLDW vs QLD
$1,653
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GLDW 0.99%
$18,525
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GLDW | QLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $1,576 | $170 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $5,953 | $612 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $16,872 | $1,653 |
- 0.99%GLDW
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
GLDW 75th cheapest of 95 funds
GLDW vs QLD Dividends
- GLDW
- QLD 0.16%
- GLDW
- QLD $0.12
- GLDW $0.14
- QLD $0.03
- GLDW Nov 9, 2026
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- GLDW Pays Nov 10, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- GLDW Weekly
- QLD Quarterly
Distribution history
GLDW vs QLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GLDW 33.0%QLD 36.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- GLDW −0.24QLD 1.04
- Worst fall
- GLDW −35.4%QLD −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- GLDW 0.37QLD 2.48
GLDW and QLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
