PSMR ranks 3rd and GMAY 27th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
GMAY vs PSMR
PSMR −0.36pt a year
0.85%0.49%
GMAY 58.7×the volume
63.6K1.08K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+11.9%+11.9%
GMAY vs PSMR Performance
+7.7%+12.5%
- GMAY 0.85%
- PSMR 0.49%, better
- GMAY $361M
- PSMR $90M
- GMAY +7.7%
- PSMR +12.5%, better
- GMAY 3
- PSMR 3
- GMAY 63.6K sh, better
- PSMR 1.08K sh
- GMAY $43.10
- PSMR $32.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GMAY | PSMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C42 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | A80Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | B64 | |
| Durability | A74Higher | B64 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. GMAY and PSMR are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GMAYC
PSMRB
In short
GMAY First Trust runs a buffer fund for every month of the calendar, and GMAY holds the May slot: a 15% cushion on SPY's price return over a one-year outcome period, paid for with a cap on the upside set when the period begins.
PSMR A 15-point cushion on SPY, reset every April, for 0.49% a year while the typical buffer fund charges more. Pacer and Swan's moderate tier trades away some upside (a cap set each period) for a floor you know going in.
Stated mandate
GMAY The Fund seeks returns corresponding to the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses during the stated outcome period.
PSMR The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GMAY vs PSMR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GMAY vs PSMR Cost
Overpaying GMAY vs PSMR
$6,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GMAY 0.85%
$16,199
PSMR 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GMAY | PSMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $883 | $625 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,394 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $9,792 | $6,407 |
- 0.85%GMAY
- 0.49%PSMR, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMR 5th cheapest of 51 funds
GMAY 37th cheapest of 51 funds
GMAY vs PSMR Dividends
- GMAY None
- PSMR None
Distribution history
GMAY vs PSMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GMAY 5.8%, betterPSMR 6.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- GMAY 1.34, betterPSMR 1.31
- Worst fall
- GMAY −11.7%PSMR −11.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GMAY 0.40PSMR 0.46
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.