Skip to content

GMAY vs PSMO

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May

GMAYCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSMOBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMO −0.36pt a year

GMAY0.85%PSMO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

GMAY 7.8×the volume

GMAY63.6KPSMO8.14K

3Y return · a year

GMAY +0.1pt

GMAY+11.9%PSMO+11.8%

GMAY vs PSMO Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+7.7%GMAY+10.5%PSMO

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. GMAY +7.7%. PSMO +10.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%12.5%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GMAY 0.85%
PSMO 0.49%, better
Fund size
GMAY $361M
PSMO $117M
1Y total return
GMAY +7.7%
PSMO +10.5%, better
Holdings
GMAY 3
PSMO 3
Avg volume (30D)
GMAY 63.6K sh, better
PSMO 8.14K sh
NAV per share
GMAY $43.10
PSMO $32.98
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMAY: Cost 13, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 80, Holdings 64, Durability 74. PSMO: Cost 70, Risk 47, Mission 95, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMAY, PSMO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMAYPSMO
Cost30% weightF13A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightC42C47Higher
Tradability15% weightA80HigherB66
Holdings10% weightB64Not scored
Durability5% weightA74HigherB66

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMAY and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMO ranks 1st and GMAY 27th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 60
  3. Rank 27CGJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 42
  4. Rank 27CGMAYFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - MayScore 42
  5. Rank 31CGSEPFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 41

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMAYCFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May

PSMOBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

In short

GMAY First Trust runs a buffer fund for every month of the calendar, and GMAY holds the May slot: a 15% cushion on SPY's price return over a one-year outcome period, paid for with a cap on the upside set when the period begins.

PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.

Stated mandate

GMAY The Fund seeks returns corresponding to the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses during the stated outcome period.

PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • GMAY The deal is spelled out in the fund's own documents: protection against the first 15% of losses on SPY's price return, plus a stated cap, across a defined one-year outcome period.ftportfolios.com
  • May is just one rung. GJAN through GDEC run the same 15% structure on a rolling monthly schedule, so start dates can be staggered instead of hostage to one entry point.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself. Plain large-cap US equity price return, no custom index or factor tilt to decode.
  • One of the easier funds in its buffer peer group to get in and out of, with a mid-sized asset base standing behind it.
  • PSMO Charges 0.49% a year versus a 0.79% median across its 15%-buffer peer group, one of the lower-cost ways to own this structure.
  • Pacer's moderate SOS funds (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ) all price at 0.49%, while the Innovator power-buffer lineup (POCT, PJUL, PJAN) runs 0.79%.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not an abstract index, so what's being buffered is a fund you can watch tick by tick.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • GMAY At 0.85%, it sits above the 0.79% median for its buffer cohort. Downside protection is a purchased feature, and the sticker shows it.
  • The cap works both ways: big SPY years get trimmed. And the 15% buffer is measured from the start of the outcome period to its end, not day by day in between.
  • Not an income vehicle. The options package is built to shape the payoff, not to pay out along the way.
  • PSMO Buffer and cap are engineered for the full one-year outcome period running October through September. Buy or sell mid-period and you may get neither in full.paceretfs.com
  • Upside stops at a cap reset each October. A runaway rally in the S&P 500 is the scenario this structure hands back in exchange for the 15% cushion.paceretfs.com
  • One of the quieter tickers in the buffer aisle, so spreads and order type matter more here than with the category's household names.

Full GMAY profile⁠

Full PSMO profile⁠

GMAY vs PSMO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMAY vs PSMO Cost

Overpaying GMAY vs PSMO

$6,407

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMAY 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PSMO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMAY 0.85%
  • PSMO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GMAY $16,199PSMO $9,792

Year by year

YearGMAYPSMOOverpaying
10$1,508$883$625
20$5,706$3,394$2,312
30$16,199$9,792$6,407

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%GMAY
  • 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds

GMAY 37th cheapest of 51 funds

GMAY vs PSMO Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
GMAY None
PSMO None

Distribution history

GMAYAll GMAY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMOAll PSMO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GMAY vs PSMO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMAY 5.8%, betterPSMO 5.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMAY 1.34, betterPSMO 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMAY −11.7%since May 2023PSMO −9.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMAY 0.40PSMO 0.41

Popular comparisons

  • GMAYCvsPSMJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMAYCvsPSMRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMAYCvsBUFCB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.