BUFC ranks 4th and GMAY 27th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
BUFC vs GMAY
BUFC −0.16pt a year
0.69%0.85%
GMAY 1.3×the volume
48.2K63.6K
BUFC vs GMAY Performance
+5.9%+7.7%
- BUFC 0.69%, better
- GMAY 0.85%
- BUFC $1.09B
- GMAY $361M
- BUFC +5.9%
- GMAY +7.7%, better
- BUFC 5
- GMAY 3
- BUFC 48.2K sh
- GMAY 63.6K sh, better
- BUFC $42.98
- GMAY $43.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFC | GMAY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57Higher | F13 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C47Higher | C42 |
| Tradability | B60 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | B64 | |
| Durability | A74 | A74 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. BUFC and GMAY are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFCB
GMAYC
In short
BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.
GMAY First Trust runs a buffer fund for every month of the calendar, and GMAY holds the May slot: a 15% cushion on SPY's price return over a one-year outcome period, paid for with a cap on the upside set when the period begins.
Stated mandate
BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.
GMAY The Fund seeks returns corresponding to the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses during the stated outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFC vs GMAY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFC vs GMAY Cost
Overpaying GMAY vs BUFC
$2,770
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFC 0.69%
$13,429
GMAY 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFC | GMAY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,508 | $276 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,706 | $1,009 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $16,199 | $2,770 |
- 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
- 0.85%GMAY
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds
GMAY 37th cheapest of 51 funds
BUFC vs GMAY Dividends
- BUFC None
- GMAY None
Distribution history
BUFC vs GMAY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFC 3.4%GMAY 5.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFC 0.82GMAY 1.34
- Worst fall
- BUFC −8.3%GMAY −11.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFC 0.26GMAY 0.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.