GMOD ranks 2nd and ORO 45th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
GMOD vs ORO
0.0%by weight
GMOD −0.75pt a year
0.50%1.25%
GMOD 15.2×the volume
11.8K777
GMOD vs ORO Performance
+11.8%+6.1%
- GMOD 0.50%, better
- ORO 1.25%
- GMOD $49M
- ORO $3M
- GMOD +11.8%, better
- ORO +6.1%
- GMOD 20
- ORO 2
- GMOD 11.8K sh, better
- ORO 777 sh
- GMOD $27.77
- ORO $19.60
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GMOD | ORO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | F20 |
| Mission | A74 | |
| Risk | A75Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | B64 | |
| Durability | C49Higher | F12 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. GMOD and ORO are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GMODA
OROF
In short
GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.
Stated mandate
GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GMOD vs ORO Holdings
How GMOD and ORO differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GMOD and 0.0% of ORO.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for GMOD and ORO.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for ORO.
Concentration
- GMOD78.4%
- ORO100.0%
- GMOD19
- ORO1
Asset class
- GMOD
- Multi-Asset
- ORO
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in GMOD19
- In both0
- Only in ORO1
Only in GMOD
19 securities, 100% of GMOD by weight
- Ishares 7 10 Year Treasury Bon14.05%
- Schwab Us Tips Etf10.09%
- Gmo Us Quality Etf9.98%
- Gmo International Value Etf9.90%
- Gmo Us Value Etf9.28%
- Gmo International Quality Etf5.18%
- Vanguard Intermediate Term Tre5.03%
- Schwab Intermediate Term U.s.5.03%
- State Street Spdr Portfolio In5.03%
- Ishares Core Msci Emerging Mar4.80%
- Gmo Domestic Resilience Etf4.08%
- Ishares Msci Japan Value Etf4.06%
- Ishares Core Msci Internationa2.97%
- Ishares Msci Emerging Markets2.85%
- Vanguard Short Term Treasury E2.49%
- Ishares Msci Eafe Small Cap Et1.95%
- Gmo Power Infrastructure Etf1.85%
- Vanguard Total International’s1.13%
- State Str Instl Invt Tr0.24%
Only in ORO
1 security, 78.5% of ORO by weight
- First American Government Obligations Fund Class X78.45%
Weight gaps
GMOD and ORO share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GMOD vs ORO Cost
Overpaying ORO vs GMOD
$12,636
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GMOD 0.50%
$9,979
ORO 1.25%
$22,615
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GMOD | ORO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $2,181 | $1,281 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $8,105 | $4,645 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $22,615 | $12,636 |
- 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
- 1.25%ORO
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds
ORO 37th cheapest of 46 funds
GMOD vs ORO Dividends
- GMOD
- ORO None
- GMOD $0.14
- ORO
- GMOD Jun 30, 2026
- ORO
- GMOD Jul 1, 2026
- ORO
- GMOD Twice a year
- ORO
Distribution history
GMOD vs ORO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GMOD 8.7%ORO 21.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- GMOD 0.89ORO 0.19
- Worst fall
- GMOD −6.5%ORO −14.3%
- Market sensitivity
- GMOD 0.48ORO 0.65
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.25% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.25% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.25% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.