Skip to content

GMOD vs TDSB

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

ETC Cabana Target Beta ETF

TDSBBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GMOD −0.41pt a year

GMOD0.50%TDSB0.91%

Avg volume · 30D

GMOD 2.1×the volume

GMOD11.8KTDSB5.69K

GMOD vs TDSB Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GMOD+5.9%TDSB

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GMOD +11.8%. TDSB +5.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%7.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GMOD 0.50%, better
TDSB 0.91%
Fund size
GMOD $49M
TDSB $49M
1Y total return
GMOD +11.8%, better
TDSB +5.9%
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
TDSB 1.91%
Holdings
GMOD 20
TDSB 11
Avg volume (30D)
GMOD 11.8K sh, better
TDSB 5.69K sh
NAV per share
GMOD $27.77
TDSB $24.93
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49. TDSB: Cost 53, Risk 70, Mission 65, Tradability 50, Holdings 42, Durability 62.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMOD, TDSB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMODTDSB
Cost30% weightA90HigherC53
Mission25% weightA74HigherB65
Risk15% weightA75HigherA70
Tradability15% weightA73HigherC50
Holdings10% weightB64HigherC42
Durability5% weightC49B62Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMOD and TDSB are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and TDSB 16th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 16BMKAMMKAM ETFScore 57
  5. Rank 16BTDSBETC Cabana Target Beta ETFScore 57
  6. Rank 18BBDGSBridges Capital Tactical ETFScore 56

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

TDSBBETC Cabana Target Beta ETF

In short

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

TDSB Five sleeves (stocks, bonds, real estate, currencies, commodities) actively shuffled in pursuit of growth with limited volatility and looser ties to the stock market. Its yardstick is the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, not the cap-weighted one.

Stated mandate

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

TDSB The Fund seeks long-term growth with limited volatility and reduced correlation to overall equity-market performance through active allocation among equities, fixed income, real estate, currencies, and commodities.

Why people hold it

  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.
  • TDSB Genuinely multi-asset: equities, fixed income, real estate, currencies and commodities in one wrapper, reallocated by an active manager instead of parked at fixed weights.
  • The 0.91% fee sits just under the typical tactical multi-asset fund in its peer group, which is not where actively steered strategies usually land.
  • Trading since 2020, so the allocation calls have a live record behind them rather than a backtest.
  • Income arrives on a quarterly schedule, and the mandate is explicitly written around reduced correlation to equity markets.

Worth knowing

  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.
  • TDSB Thinly traded. Expect wider bid-ask spreads than a mainstream index fund, and more price impact on bigger orders.
  • Cheaper tactical allocators share the shelf: ENDW at 0.22% and ONOF at 0.39% run their own versions of the go-anywhere playbook for a fraction of the fee.
  • Everything rides on the manager's rotation calls. The stated goal is growth with limited volatility, not keeping pace with a straight stock index.

Full GMOD profile⁠

Full TDSB profile⁠

GMOD vs TDSB Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMOD vs TDSB Cost

Overpaying TDSB vs GMOD

$7,228

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

  • TDSB 0.91%

    $17,207

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMOD 0.50%
  • TDSB 0.91%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TDSB $17,207GMOD $9,979

Year by year

YearGMODTDSBOverpaying
10$900$1,610$710
20$3,460$6,076$2,616
30$9,979$17,207$7,228

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
  • 0.91%TDSB
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

TDSB 21st cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD vs TDSB Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
TDSB 1.91%
Payout (12M)
GMOD No data
TDSB $0.47
Last payment
GMOD $0.14
TDSB $0.04
Ex-dividend
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
TDSB Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
TDSB Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
GMOD Twice a year
TDSB Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD
TDSBQuarterly · 20 paymentsAll TDSB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2020 $0.11; Dec 30, 2021 $0.45; Mar 25, 2022 $0.03; Jun 24, 2022 $0.06; Sep 27, 2022 $0.08; Dec 27, 2022 $0.22; Jun 27, 2023 $0.15; Sep 26, 2023 $0.17; Dec 26, 2023 $0.28; Mar 25, 2024 $0.19; Jun 24, 2024 $0.07; Sep 24, 2024 $0.16; Dec 30, 2024 $0.34; Mar 26, 2025 $0.11; Jun 26, 2025 $0.10; Sep 29, 2025 $0.13; Dec 30, 2025 $0.13; Mar 27, 2026 $0.17; Jun 26, 2026 $0.13; Sep 28, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD

GMOD vs TDSB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025TDSB 6.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025TDSB 0.66
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025TDSB −19.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMOD 0.48TDSB 0.52

Popular comparisons

  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TDSBBvsENDWA

    ETC Cabana Target Beta ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.91% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TDSBBvsPTBDA

    ETC Cabana Target Beta ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.91% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TDSBBvsRISNA

    ETC Cabana Target Beta ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.91% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.