GMOD ranks 2nd and TDSB 16th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
GMOD vs TDSB
GMOD −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.91%
GMOD 2.1×the volume
11.8K5.69K
GMOD vs TDSB Performance
+11.8%+5.9%
- GMOD 0.50%, better
- TDSB 0.91%
- GMOD $49M
- TDSB $49M
- GMOD +11.8%, better
- TDSB +5.9%
- GMOD
- TDSB 1.91%
- GMOD 20
- TDSB 11
- GMOD 11.8K sh, better
- TDSB 5.69K sh
- GMOD $27.77
- TDSB $24.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GMOD | TDSB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | C53 |
| Mission | A74Higher | B65 |
| Risk | A75Higher | A70 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | B64Higher | C42 |
| Durability | C49 | B62Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. GMOD and TDSB are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GMODA
TDSBB
In short
GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.
TDSB Five sleeves (stocks, bonds, real estate, currencies, commodities) actively shuffled in pursuit of growth with limited volatility and looser ties to the stock market. Its yardstick is the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, not the cap-weighted one.
Stated mandate
GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.
TDSB The Fund seeks long-term growth with limited volatility and reduced correlation to overall equity-market performance through active allocation among equities, fixed income, real estate, currencies, and commodities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GMOD vs TDSB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GMOD vs TDSB Cost
Overpaying TDSB vs GMOD
$7,228
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GMOD 0.50%
$9,979
TDSB 0.91%
$17,207
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GMOD | TDSB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,610 | $710 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,076 | $2,616 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $17,207 | $7,228 |
- 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
- 0.91%TDSB
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds
TDSB 21st cheapest of 46 funds
GMOD vs TDSB Dividends
- GMOD
- TDSB 1.91%
- GMOD
- TDSB $0.47
- GMOD $0.14
- TDSB $0.04
- GMOD Jun 30, 2026
- TDSB Sep 28, 2026
- GMOD Jul 1, 2026
- TDSB Sep 30, 2026
- GMOD Twice a year
- TDSB Quarterly
Distribution history
GMOD vs TDSB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GMOD 8.7%TDSB 6.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- GMOD 0.89TDSB 0.66
- Worst fall
- GMOD −6.5%TDSB −19.6%
- Market sensitivity
- GMOD 0.48TDSB 0.52
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.91% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.91% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.91% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.