GNR ranks 2nd of 14 funds in the Natural Resources Category.
GNR vs MLPI
GNR −0.28pt a year
0.40%0.68%
MLPI 1.1×the volume
341K361K
GNR vs MLPI Performance
+22.8%+21.4%
- GNR 0.40%, better
- MLPI 0.68%
- GNR $5.39B
- MLPI $962M
- GNR +31.9%
- MLPI
- GNR 2.42%
- MLPI
- GNR 110
- MLPI 24
- GNR 341K sh
- MLPI 361K sh, better
- GNR $75.69
- MLPI $54.20
ETF.net Grade
- —MLPIUnder classification review
| Pillar | GNR | MLPI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80 | |
| Mission | A76 | |
| Risk | C54 | |
| Tradability | A83 | |
| Holdings | A77 | |
| Durability | A89 |
Rank among Natural Resources funds
Our read on each fund
GNRA
MLPI—
In short
GNR Most resource ETFs are energy funds in a hard hat. GNR spreads a global, large-cap lineup across agriculture, energy, and metals and mining, roughly 90 names tracking an S&P natural resources index since 2010.
MLPI Midstream income without the April paperwork. MLPI owns North American energy infrastructure names, keeps MLPs to a slice of the index so shareholders get a 1099 instead of K-1s, and sells calls on MLP ETFs for monthly cash.
Stated mandate
GNR The fund seeks to provide investment results corresponding generally to the total return performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. It provides exposure to large-cap companies across agriculture, energy, and metals and mining.
MLPI The Fund seeks high monthly income with potential equity appreciation by investing in MLPs and energy infrastructure companies and using a data-driven call-option strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GNR vs MLPI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GNR vs MLPI Cost
Overpaying MLPI vs GNR
$5,162
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GNR 0.40%
$8,090
MLPI 0.68%
$13,252
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GNR | MLPI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $1,215 | $492 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $4,633 | $1,840 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $13,252 | $5,162 |
- 0.40%GNR, cheaper
- 0.68%MLPI
- Middle half of Natural Resources funds
- Median 0.46%
GNR 4th cheapest of 14 funds
MLPI 11th cheapest of 14 funds
GNR vs MLPI Dividends
- GNR 2.42%
- MLPI
- GNR $1.82
- MLPI
- GNR $0.86
- MLPI $0.60
- GNR Jun 1, 2026
- MLPI Oct 21, 2026
- GNR Jun 3, 2026
- MLPI Oct 23, 2026
- GNR Twice a year
- MLPI Monthly
Distribution history
GNR vs MLPI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GNR 15.9%MLPI
- Return per unit of risk
- GNR 0.75MLPI
- Worst fall
- GNR −25.7%MLPI
- Market sensitivity
- GNR 0.48MLPI −0.20
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.