ICOP ranks 3rd and GOLS 18th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.
GOLS vs ICOP
ICOP −0.43pt a year
0.90%0.47%
ICOP 22.6×the volume
4.39K99.1K
GOLS vs ICOP Performance
+3.8%−10.6%
- GOLS 0.90%
- ICOP 0.47%, better
- GOLS $38M
- ICOP $397M
- GOLS
- ICOP +32.7%
- GOLS
- ICOP 1.81%
- GOLS 45
- ICOP 80
- GOLS 4.39K sh
- ICOP 99.1K sh, better
- GOLS $27.22
- ICOP $46.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GOLS | ICOP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A82Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A81Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | D39 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | F16 | C41Higher |
| Durability | F24 | A77Higher |
Rank among Global Thematic funds
Same Category. GOLS and ICOP are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GOLSD
ICOPB
In short
GOLS Concerts, stadiums, ticket stubs: GOLS packages the live and sports economy into one ticker. Gabelli launched it in 2026 as a narrow theme inside the communication services aisle, with a single stated goal of capital appreciation.
ICOP The copper-miner aisle has a price leader. ICOP tracks a global index of copper and metals miners for 0.47% a year, the lowest sticker in its peer group, with BlackRock's indexing machinery behind it.
Stated mandate
GOLS The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
ICOP The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equities of companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GOLS vs ICOP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GOLS vs ICOP Cost
Overpaying GOLS vs ICOP
$7,622
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GOLS 0.90%
$17,040
ICOP 0.47%
$9,418
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GOLS | ICOP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,593 | $847 | $746 |
| 20 | $6,015 | $3,261 | $2,754 |
| 30 | $17,040 | $9,418 | $7,622 |
- 0.90%GOLS
- 0.47%ICOP, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Thematic funds
- Median 0.58%
ICOP 5th cheapest of 18 funds
GOLS 18th cheapest of 18 funds
GOLS vs ICOP Dividends
- GOLS
- ICOP 1.81%
- GOLS None
- ICOP $0.89
- GOLS
- ICOP $0.27
- GOLS
- ICOP Jun 15, 2026
- GOLS
- ICOP Jun 18, 2026
- GOLS
- ICOP Twice a year
Distribution history
GOLS vs ICOP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GOLS ICOP 30.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GOLS ICOP 0.93
- Worst fall
- GOLS ICOP −38.6%
- Market sensitivity
- GOLS 0.53ICOP 1.34
GOLS and ICOP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.90% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

