XLII ranks 2nd and GPTY 19th of 22 funds in the Sector Option Income Category.
GPTY vs XLII
XLII −0.71pt a year
1.06%0.35%
GPTY 3.7×the volume
58.9K15.9K
GPTY vs XLII Performance
+7.5%+9.0%
- GPTY 1.06%
- XLII 0.35%, better
- GPTY $126M
- XLII $17M
- GPTY +7.5%
- XLII +9.0%, better
- GPTY 41.99%, better
- XLII 13.46%
- GPTY 69
- XLII 3
- GPTY 58.9K sh, better
- XLII 15.9K sh
- GPTY $36.71
- XLII $24.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GPTY | XLII |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F14 | A76Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | F19 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | B61Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | B61Higher | C51 |
| Durability | A72Higher | C51 |
Rank among Sector Option Income funds
Same Category. GPTY and XLII are both graded against the same 22 Sector Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GPTYD
XLIIA
In short
GPTY Most YieldMax funds rent exposure to a single stock. GPTY actually owns a focused basket of 15 to 30 AI infrastructure and tech names and sells call spreads against them, so the income comes with a slice of upside still attached.
XLII Covered calls swarm tech; far rarer on machinery, railroads and defense primes. XLII owns the 1998-vintage industrials SPDR and sells short-dated calls on that fund itself, paying out monthly.
Stated mandate
GPTY The Fund seeks current income and capital appreciation through a focused portfolio of approximately 15 to 30 publicly traded AI infrastructure and technology companies. It seeks option income by selling call spreads on portfolio holdings while retaining direct equity exposure.
XLII The fund is actively managed to pursue current income while retaining the potential for long-term capital growth. It invests in XLI and sells call options on XLI to generate additional income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GPTY vs XLII Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GPTY vs XLII Cost
Overpaying GPTY vs XLII
$12,529
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GPTY 1.06%
$19,655
XLII 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GPTY | XLII | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,864 | $634 | $1,230 |
| 20 | $6,987 | $2,454 | $4,533 |
| 30 | $19,655 | $7,126 | $12,529 |
- 1.06%GPTY
- 0.35%XLII, cheaper
- Middle half of Sector Option Income funds
- Median 0.47%
XLII cheapest of 22 funds
GPTY 19th cheapest of 22 funds
GPTY vs XLII Dividends
- GPTY 41.99%, better
- XLII 13.46%
- GPTY $15.39
- XLII $3.23
- GPTY $0.26
- XLII $0.30
- GPTY Oct 28, 2026
- XLII Oct 1, 2026
- GPTY Oct 29, 2026
- XLII Oct 5, 2026
- GPTY Weekly
- XLII Monthly
Distribution history
GPTY vs XLII Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GPTY 31.7%XLII 11.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- GPTY 0.66XLII 0.60
- Worst fall
- GPTY −26.5%XLII −10.1%
- Market sensitivity
- GPTY 2.01XLII 0.53
Popular comparisons
- 1.06% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.06% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.06% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.