XLSI ranks 1st and GPTY 19th of 22 funds in the Sector Option Income Category.
GPTY vs XLSI
XLSI −0.71pt a year
1.06%0.35%
GPTY 3.1×the volume
58.9K19.2K
GPTY vs XLSI Performance
+7.5%+14.7%
- GPTY 1.06%
- XLSI 0.35%, better
- GPTY $126M
- XLSI $25M
- GPTY +7.5%
- XLSI +14.7%, better
- GPTY 41.99%, better
- XLSI 12.22%
- GPTY 69
- XLSI 2
- GPTY 58.9K sh, better
- XLSI 19.2K sh
- GPTY $36.71
- XLSI $23.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GPTY | XLSI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F14 | A76Higher |
| Mission | A88 | |
| Risk | F19 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | B61 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | B61Higher | C51 |
| Durability | A72Higher | B58 |
Rank among Sector Option Income funds
Same Category. GPTY and XLSI are both graded against the same 22 Sector Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GPTYD
XLSIA
In short
GPTY Most YieldMax funds rent exposure to a single stock. GPTY actually owns a focused basket of 15 to 30 AI infrastructure and tech names and sells call spreads against them, so the income comes with a slice of upside still attached.
XLSI Covered calls on the market's quietest aisle. XLSI owns the classic consumer staples sector fund and sells calls on it, turning soup, soap and razors into monthly income while giving up gains above the strike.
Stated mandate
GPTY The Fund seeks current income and capital appreciation through a focused portfolio of approximately 15 to 30 publicly traded AI infrastructure and technology companies. It seeks option income by selling call spreads on portfolio holdings while retaining direct equity exposure.
XLSI The fund uses an actively managed strategy intended to provide current income while preserving prospects for long-term capital growth. It invests in the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF and sells call options on that ETF to generate additional income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GPTY vs XLSI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GPTY vs XLSI Cost
Overpaying GPTY vs XLSI
$12,529
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GPTY 1.06%
$19,655
XLSI 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GPTY | XLSI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,864 | $634 | $1,230 |
| 20 | $6,987 | $2,454 | $4,533 |
| 30 | $19,655 | $7,126 | $12,529 |
- 1.06%GPTY
- 0.35%XLSI, cheaper
- Middle half of Sector Option Income funds
- Median 0.47%
XLSI cheapest of 22 funds
GPTY 19th cheapest of 22 funds
GPTY vs XLSI Dividends
- GPTY 41.99%, better
- XLSI 12.22%
- GPTY $15.39
- XLSI $2.92
- GPTY $0.26
- XLSI $0.32
- GPTY Oct 28, 2026
- XLSI Oct 1, 2026
- GPTY Oct 29, 2026
- XLSI Oct 5, 2026
- GPTY Weekly
- XLSI Monthly
Distribution history
GPTY vs XLSI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GPTY 31.7%XLSI 12.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GPTY 0.66XLSI 0.48
- Worst fall
- GPTY −26.5%XLSI −7.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GPTY 2.01XLSI 0.19
Popular comparisons
- 1.06% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.06% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.06% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.